David Rascon et al v. Wells Fargo Bank NA et al
Filing
25
ORDER that the court deems Plaintiffs failure to oppose as consent to granting the motion to dismiss, and GRANTS the motion 20 . Defendants Motion to Strike Portions of Plaintiffs Complaint is VACATED as moot 22 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lc)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DAVID RASCON; TERESA RASCON,
12
13
14
Plaintiffs,
v.
16
WELLS FARGO BANK, NA
FORMERLY KNOWN AS (F/K/A),
WACHOVIA MORTGAGE FSB, et
al.
Defendants.
17
___________________________
15
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. EDCV 11-01117 DDP (DTBx)
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS
[Motions filed on 9/16/11]
Presently before the court is the Motion to Dismiss
19
Plaintiffs’ Complaint filed by Wells Fargo Bank, NA (“Wells
20
Fargo”).
21
court GRANTS the motion.
Because Plaintiffs have not filed an opposition, the
22
Central District of California Local Rule 7-9 requires an
23
opposing party to file an opposition to any motion at least twenty-
24
one (21) days prior to the date designated for hearing the motion.
25
C.D. CAL. L.R. 7-9.
26
“[t]he failure to file any required paper, or the failure to file
27
it within the deadline, may be deemed consent to the granting or
28
denial of the motion.”
Additionally, Local Rule 7-12 provides that
C.D. CAL. L.R. 7-12.
1
The hearing on Defendant’s motion was set for October 17,
2
2011.
Plaintiffs’ opposition was therefore due by September 26,
3
2011.
As of the date of this Order, Plaintiffs have not filed an
4
opposition, or any other filing that could be construed as a
5
request for a continuance.
6
Plaintiffs’ failure to oppose as consent to granting the motion to
7
dismiss, and GRANTS the motion.
8
Portions of Plaintiffs’ Complaint is VACATED as moot.
Accordingly, the court deems
Defendant’s Motion to Strike
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
12
13
Dated: September 28, 2011
DEAN D. PREGERSON
United States District Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?