Beatrice L Baugus v. Michael J Astrue

Filing 21

ORDER AWARDING EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) AND COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920 by Magistrate Judge Ralph Zarefsky. [NOTE CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT] Based upon the parties' Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal Access to Justice Act Fees, Costs, and Expenses: IT IS ORDERED that fees and expenses in the amount of $4,000.00 as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412 be awarded to Plaintiff. 20 (gr)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 Steven G. Rosales Attorney at Law: 222224 Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing 12631 East Imperial Highway, Suite C-115Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 Tel.: (562)868-5886 Fax: (562)868-8868 E-mail: rohlfing.office@rohlfinglaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Beatrice L. Baugus 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 BEATRICE L. BAUGUS, 11 12 13 Plaintiff, vs. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, 14 Defendant 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: EDCV 11-01118 VBK {PROPOSED} ORDER AWARDING EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) AND COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920 16 17 18 Based upon the parties’ Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal Access to Justice Act Fees, Costs, and Expenses: 19 IT IS ORDERED that fees and expenses in the amount of $4,000.00 as 20 authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412 be awarded to Plaintiff. subje ct to the terms of the 21 Stipulation. 22 DATE: October 24, 2012 23 24 ___________________________________ For THE HONORABLE VICTOR B. KENTON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25 26 27 28 -1- 1 Respectfully submitted, 2 LAW OFFICES OF Lawrence D. Rohlfing 3 4 /s/ Steven G. Rosales _________________________ Steven G. Rosales Attorney for plaintiff Beatrice L. Baugus 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?