Michael N. Flores v. Michael J. Astrue

Filing 18

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AS TO WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE by Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh: IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that, no later than July 12, 2012, Petitioner shall inform the Court in writing why this case should not be dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute. Failure to timely file a response will result in a recommendation that this case be dismissed. IT IS SO ORDERED. (ca)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 MICHAEL N. FLORES, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, ) COMMISSION OF THE ) SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, ) ) Defendant. ) ) Case No. ED CV 11-1280-PJW ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AS TO WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE 16 17 On March 7, 2012, after a telephonic hearing, the Court issued an 18 order, granting the request of Marc Kalagian, Plaintiff’s attorney of 19 record, to withdraw and requiring Mr. Kalagian to mail Plaintiff a 20 certified copy of the administrative record by Friday, March 9, 2012. 21 In its order, the Court set a new briefing schedule, under which 22 Plaintiff was to file a brief presenting his arguments no later than 23 April 9, 2012. 24 extension of time. Plaintiff has failed to do so, nor has he requested an 25 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that, no later than July 12, 2012, 26 Petitioner shall inform the Court in writing why this case should not 27 be dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute. 28 Failure to 1 timely file a response will result in a recommendation that this case 2 be dismissed. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED 4 DATED: June 19, 2012. 5 6 7 PATRICK J. WALSH UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 S:\PJW\Cases-Soc Sec\FLORES, 1280\OSC_not dismiss.wpd 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?