Michael N. Flores v. Michael J. Astrue

Filing 18

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AS TO WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE by Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh: IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that, no later than July 12, 2012, Petitioner shall inform the Court in writing why this case should not be dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute. Failure to timely file a response will result in a recommendation that this case be dismissed. IT IS SO ORDERED. (ca)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15

MICHAEL N. FLORES,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
)
COMMISSION OF THE
)
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, )
)
Defendant.
)
)

Case No. ED CV 11-1280-PJW
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AS TO WHY
ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED
WITH PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO
PROSECUTE

16
17

On March 7, 2012, after a telephonic hearing, the Court issued an

18

order, granting the request of Marc Kalagian, Plaintiff’s attorney of

19

record, to withdraw and requiring Mr. Kalagian to mail Plaintiff a

20

certified copy of the administrative record by Friday, March 9, 2012.

21

In its order, the Court set a new briefing schedule, under which

22

Plaintiff was to file a brief presenting his arguments no later than

23

April 9, 2012.

24

extension of time.

Plaintiff has failed to do so, nor has he requested an

25

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that, no later than July 12, 2012,

26

Petitioner shall inform the Court in writing why this case should not

27

be dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute.

28

Failure to

1

timely file a response will result in a recommendation that this case

2

be dismissed.

3

IT IS SO ORDERED

4

DATED:

June 19, 2012.

5
6
7

PATRICK J. WALSH
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

S:\PJW\Cases-Soc Sec\FLORES, 1280\OSC_not dismiss.wpd

2