Christopher Marine et al v. Lowes Home Improvement Warehouse Inc et al
Filing
10
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym (am)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
CHARLES D. MAY, ESQ. (Bar No. 129663)
GENE B. SHARAGA, ESQ. (Bar No. 131661)
RODRIGO J. BOZOGHLIAN, ESQ. (Bar No.: 249732)
THARPE & HOWELL, LLP
15250 Ventura Boulevard, Ninth Floor
Sherman Oaks, California 91403-3221
Telephone: (818) 205-9955
Facsimile: (818)205-9944
E-Mail: cmay@tharpe-howell.com
E-Mail: gsharaga@tharpe-howell.com
E-Mail: spyun@tharpe-howell.com
Attorneys for Defendant,
LOWE’S HIW, INC.
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - EASTERN DIVISION
10
11
CHRISTOPHER MARINE; KELLI
MARINE,
12
13
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
v.
14
LOWE’S HOME IMPROVEMENT
WAREHOUSE, INC., a North
16 Carolina corporation; LOWE’S
COMPANIES, INC., a North Carolina
17 corporation and DOES 1 to 100,
inclusive,
15
18
Defendants.
19
CASE NO. ED CV 11-01480 JFW(SPx)
(Riverside County Superior Court Case
No. RIC 1111858)
PROTECTIVE ORDER
20
21
22
AGREED ORDER OF PROTECTION
It appearing to the Court that the Plaintiff and Defendant are in agreement
23
that Lowe’s HIW, Inc. (hereinafter “the Defendant”) possesses proprietary policies
24
and procedures, as well as personnel files of present and former employees, that
25
include confidential information that may be subject to discovery in the
26
proceedings in this matter but which should not be made available to the public
27
generally, this Court hereby orders that:
28
-1PROTECTIVE ORDER
Marine v. Lowe’s HIW, Inc.
Case No. ED CV 11-01480 VAP SPx
1
1.
All documents produced or information disclosed and any other
2
documents or records designated as “confidential” by the Defendant shall be
3
revealed only to Plaintiff, counsel of record in this case, paralegals and secretarial
4
employees under counsel’s direct supervision, and such persons as are employed
5
by counsel to act as experts in this action. The information considered as
6
“confidential” and disclosed only in accord with the terms of this paragraph shall
7
include, without limitation, all of the Defendant’s policies and procedures, as well
8
as personnel records, including disciplinary records, identity, or any other
9
information or documentation supplied by the Defendant in response to Plaintiff’s
10
11
Interrogatories or Requests for Production.
2.
Counsel for Plaintiff shall use all documents and information
12
produced or disclosed by the Defendant solely for the purposes of preparation for
13
and trial of this action. Under no circumstances shall information or materials
14
covered by this Protective Order be disclosed to anyone other than Plaintiff’s
15
counsel of record in this action, paralegals, secretarial employees under counsel’s
16
direct supervision, and such persons employed to act as experts in this action. At
17
the conclusion of the proceedings in this action, all documents and information
18
subject to this Order, including any copies or extracts or summaries thereof, or
19
documents containing information taken therefrom, shall be returned to counsel
20
for the Defendant.
21
3.
Prior to disclosure of any documents designated as “confidential” to
22
paralegals or secretarial employees of counsel or Plaintiff, counsel for Plaintiff
23
shall require such employees to read this Protective Order and agree to be bound
24
by its terms.
25
4.
If counsel for Plaintiff determines that for purposes of this action,
26
documents or information produced by the Defendant and designated as
27
“confidential” must be revealed to a person employed to act as an expert in this
28
action, then counsel may reveal the designated documents or information to such
-2PROTECTIVE ORDER
Marine v. Lowe’s HIW, Inc.
Case No. ED CV 11-01480 VAP SPx
1
person, after first complying with the following:
(a)
2
Counsel for the Plaintiff shall have the expert read this Order and
shall explain the contents thereof to such expert.
3
(b)
4
Counsel for the Plaintiff shall require such expert to sign a copy of
5
this protective order that states: “I have read and understood the terms
6
of this protective order. I further agree to be bound by its terms.”
7
Nothing in this paragraph shall be deemed to enlarge the right of
8
Defendant to conduct discovery of any of Plaintiff’s experts, except
9
solely with respect to the ability of such expert to protect confidential
information and documents from re-disclosure.
10
5.
11
In accordance with Local Rule 79-5.1, any papers filed with the Court
12
that contain information that has been designated as "Confidential" or "Attorneys'
13
Eyes Only," shall be accompanied by an application to file the papers or the
14
portion thereof containing the designated information under seal; and the
15
application shall be directed to the judge to whom the papers are directed. For
16
motions, the parties shall file a redacted version of the motion and supporting
17
papers.
6.
18
At the conclusion of the proceedings in this action, all documents and
19
information subject to this Order, including any copies or extracts or summaries
20
thereof, or documents containing information taken therefrom, shall be returned to
21
counsel for the Defendant.
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
-3PROTECTIVE ORDER
Marine v. Lowe’s HIW, Inc.
Case No. ED CV 11-01480 VAP SPx
1
7.
This Order is subject to revocation and modification by Order of the
2
Court upon written stipulation of the parties, or upon motion and reasonable
3
notice, including opportunity for hearing and presentation of evidence.
4
5
Entered this _21st_ day of _December_, 2011.
6
______________________________
Hon. Sheri Pym
United States Magistrate Judge
7
8
9
10
11
APPROVED FOR ENTRY:
__________________________________
Attorney for Plaintiffs, Christopher Marine;
Kelli Marine
12
13
__________________________________
Attorney for Defendant Lowe’s HIW, Inc.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4PROTECTIVE ORDER
Marine v. Lowe’s HIW, Inc.
Case No. ED CV 11-01480 VAP SPx
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?