Michael J Randall v. Wells Fargo Bank NA et al

Filing 21

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT by Judge Manuel L. Real. Defendants Motion to Dismiss the All Cause of Action to the Complaint of Plaintiff, MICHAEL J. RANDALL (Plaintiff), pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 12(b)(6), is GRANTED WITH PREJUDICE since that cause of action fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (im)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP
T. Robert Finlay, Esq., SBN 167280
David L. Chaffin, Esq., SBN 258459
4665 MacArthur Court, Suite 280
Newport Beach, CA 92660 (Randall/Federal/[Proposed] OrderMTD)
Telephone: [phone]; Facsimile: [phone]

JS-6

Attorneys for Defendant, NOTE: CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT
WELLS FARGO BANK N.A., d/b/a WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
WELLS FARGO BANK N.A., d/b/a
WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE;, )
)
FIRST AMERICAN TRUSTEE
)
SERVICING SOLUTIONS, LLC as
)
TRUSTEE and DOES 1 through 50
)
inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
MICHAEL J. RANDALL,

Case No: EDCV11-1616 R(DTBx)
ORDER GRANTING MOTION
TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S
COMPLAINT

Date:
Time:
Ctrm.:

November 21, 2011
2:00 p.m.
2

On November 21, 2011 at 2:00 p.m. or shortly thereafter, in Courtroom 2 of
the above-described Court, came before the Court the regularly scheduled hearing
on the Motion to Dismiss of Defendant WELLS FARGO BANK N.A., d/b/a
WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE (“Wells Fargo” or “Defendant”).
-1[PROPOSED] ORDER

1

Upon consideration of all the written submissions and any oral arguments

2

regarding the aforementioned Motions, THE COURT ORDERS AS

3

FOLLOWS:

4

1.

Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the All Cause of Action to the

5

Complaint of Plaintiff, MICHAEL J. RANDALL (“Plaintiff”), pursuant to Federal

6

Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 12(b)(6), is GRANTED WITH PREJUDICE since

7

that cause of action fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

8

IT IS SO ORDERED.

9
10
11

Date: December 1, 2011
The Honorable US District Judge

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-2[PROPOSED] ORDER