Patricia A. Morris v. Michael J. Astrue

Filing 12

ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Magistrate Judge Victor B. Kenton, The above captioned matter is dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its own fees, costs, and expenses. re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 11 Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (lmh)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Lawrence D. Rohlfing Attorney at Law: 119433 Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing 12631 East Imperial Highway, Suite C-115 Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 Tel.: (562)868-5886 Fax: (562)868-5491 E-mail: rohlfing.office@rohlfinglaw.com J S -6 Attorneys for Plaintiff Patricia A Morris 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION 8 9 10 11 PATRICIA A MORRIS, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 vs. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. 16 17 ) Case No.: 5:11 CV 1845 DSF VBK ) ) ORDER OF DISMISSAL ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 The above captioned matter is dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its own fees, costs, and expenses. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATE: February 08, 2012 /s/ ___________________________________ THE HONORABLE VICTOR B. KENTON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25 26 -1- 1 2 3 4 DATE: February 6, 2012 Respectfully submitted, LAW OFFICES OF LAWRENCE D. ROHLFING /s/ Lawrence D. Rohlfing BY: __________________ Lawrence D. Rohlfing Attorney for plaintiff Patricia A Morris 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 -2- 1 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE FOR CASE NUMBER 5:11 CV 1845 DSF VBK I hereby certify that I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Court for this court by using the CM/ECF system on February 6, 2012. I certify that all participants in the case are registered CM/ECF users and that service will be accomplished by the CM/ECF system. /s/ Lawrence D. Rohlfing _______________________________ Lawrence D. Rohlfing Attorneys for Plaintiff ___________ 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?