Rose Ann Fernandez v. The State of California Government et al
Filing
22
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Fernando M. Olguin. If plaintiff objects to being declared a vexatious litigant, she shall file a response to this Order to Show Cause NO LATER THAN APRIL 20, 2012. **See Order for details.** (ch)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ROSE ANN FERNANDEZ,
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
GOVERNMENT, et al.,
15
16
Defendants.
17
18
19
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
NO. ED CV 11-1932 SJO (FMO)
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
Local Rule 83-8.2 provides that the court may declare a party to be a vexatious litigant,
stating:
20
On its own motion or on motion of a party, after opportunity to be
21
heard, the Court may, at any time, order a party to give security in such
22
amount as the Court determines to be appropriate to secure the payment of
23
any costs, sanctions or other amounts which may be awarded against a
24
vexatious litigant, and may make such other orders as are appropriate to
25
control the conduct of a vexatious litigant. Such orders may include, without
26
limitation, a directive to the Clerk not to accept further filings from the litigant
27
without payment of normal filing fees and/or without written authorization
28
1
from a judge of the Court or a Magistrate Judge, issued upon such showing
2
of the evidence supporting the claim as the judge may require.
3
Local Rule 83-8.2. “Any order issued under [Local Rule]. 83-8.2 shall be based on a finding that
4
the litigant to whom the order is issued has abused the Court’s process and is likely to continue
5
such abuse, unless protective measures are taken.” Local Rule 83-8.3; see also DeLong v.
6
Hennessey, 912 F.2d 1144, 1147 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1001 (1990) (To support a
7
vexatious litigant finding, “[a]t the least, the records needs to show, in some manner, that the
8
litigant’s activities were numerous or abusive.”).
9
Pursuant to Local Rule 83-8.2, plaintiff Rose Ann Fernandez is Ordered to Show Cause
10
why she should not be declared a vexatious litigant in light of her repeated filing of frivolous
11
documents in closed cases. See Fernandez v. California Department of Corrections, ED CV 12-
12
0284 SJO (FMO) (Docket No. 5); Fernandez v. The State of California Government, CV 11-3430
13
UA (FMO) (Docket Nos. 5, 8, & 10-15); Fernandez v. United States Government, CV 10-0313 UA
14
(DUTY) (Docket Nos. 5-7); Fernandez v. Perris Lake School, CV 09-7240 CAS (JEM) (Docket No.
15
11); Fernandez v. Victim Compensation and Government Claims Board, CV 09-2058 UA (FMO)
16
(Docket Nos. 7-8); see also Fernandez v. The State of California Government, ED CV 11-1932
17
SJO (FMO) (Docket No. 15 – First Amended Complaint attempting to modify pending action to
18
reopen closed case (CV 11-3430 UA (FMO)) and also attempting to incorporate prior closed cases
19
and previously rejected motions into pending action).
20
If plaintiff objects to being declared a vexatious litigant, she shall file a response to this
21
Order to Show Cause no later than April 20, 2012.
22
Dated this 30th day of March, 2012.
23
24
/s/
Fernando M. Olguin
United States Magistrate Judge
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?