Michael A Haywood v. Douglas N Gericke et al

Filing 29

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Virginia A. Phillips for Report and Recommendation (Issued), 27 . IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation is approved and accepted. 2. Judgment be entered dismissing this action without prejudice. 3. The Clerk serve copies of this Order and the Judgment on the parties. (bem)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 MICHAEL A. HAYWOOD, 11 Plaintiff, v. 12 13 DOUGLAS N. GERICKE, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. ED CV 12-0025 VAP (JCG) ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 16 17 18 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, the 19 Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, and the remaining record, and has 20 made a de novo determination. 21 Nothing in the Objections refutes the Magistrate Judge’s finding that Plaintiff 22 failed, on multiple occasions, to file a First Amended Complaint as directed by the 23 Court. Nor does Plaintiff ever attempt to remedy this deficiency, even though he has 24 been given ample opportunity to do so. The Court also finds Plaintiff’s argument that 25 the Magistrate Judge engaged in “a pattern of racketeering and the corruptly [sic] 26 obstruction of the judicial legal process” unpersuasive. (Obj. at 7.) 27 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 28 1. The Report and Recommendation is approved and accepted. 1 2. Judgment be entered dismissing this action without prejudice. 2 3. The Clerk serve copies of this Order and the Judgment on the parties. 3 4 5 DATED: November 29, 2012__ ____________________________________ HON. VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?