Tomas Lemus v. Michael J Astrue
Filing
25
ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, ("EAJA") in the amount of TWO THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED FIFTY DOLLARS and no/cents ($2,650.00), as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (d), and subject to the terms and conditions of the Stipulation 24 . (afe)
WILLIAM M. KUNTZ # 153052
Attorney at Law
2 4780 Arlington Avenue
Riverside, CA 92504
3 (951) 343-3400
Fax (951) 343-4004
4 E-Mail: KuntzSSlaw @sbcglobal.net
Attorney for Plaintiff
1
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
EASTERN DIVISION
8
9
10
17
)
CASE NO.: EDCV 12-0342 MRW
)
Plaintiff,
)
[PROPOSED] ORDER AWARDING
)
EAJA FEES
v.
)
)
)
CAROLYN W. COLVIN1,
Commissioner of Social Security
)
Administration,
)
)
Defendant.
)
______________________________ )
Based upon the parties’ Stipulation for Award and Payment of Equal Access
18
to Justice Act (EAJA) Fees (“Stipulation”),
11
12
13
14
15
16
19
TOMAS LEMUS,
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney fees under the
20
Equal Access to Justice Act, ("EAJA”) in the amount of TWO THOUSAND SIX
21
HUNDRED FIFTY DOLLARS and no/cents ($2,650.00), as authorized by 28
22
U.S.C. § 2412 (d), and subject to the terms and conditions of the Stipulation.
23
DATED: April 12, 2013
__________________________________
Hon. MICHAEL R. WILNER
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
24
25
26
27
28
1
Carolyn W. Colvin became the Acting commissioner of Social Security on February 14,
2013. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Carolyn W. Colvin should
be substituted for Michael J. Astrue as the defendant in this suit. No further action need be taken
to continue this suit by reason of the last sentence of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act,
42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?