Daniel Torres v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc et al
Filing
15
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE by Judge Otis D. Wright, II:the parties are hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why (1) they failed to conduct their mandatory settlement conference by March 25, 2013, and (2) why each attorney of record should n ot be sanctioned $1,000 for violating the Courts July 18, 2012 Order. A written, joint response is due by April 3, 2013. No hearing will be held on this matter. Failure to timely respond may result in additionalsanctions, including dismissal or entry of default. (lc)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DANIEL TORRES,
12
13
14
v.
Plaintiff,
Case No. 5:12-cv-424-ODW(DTBx)
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
WAL-MARK STORES, INC. et al.,
Defendants,
15
16
On July 18, 2012, the Court ordered the parties to conduct their settlement
17
conference by March 25, 2013; and the parties selected Settlement Procedure No. 1—
18
settlement proceedings before Magistrate Judge David T. Bristow. (ECF No. 14;
19
Rule 26(f) Report 2.) To date, no settlement proceedings have been held before Judge
20
Bristow.
21
Unless exempted by the Court, the settlement conference is mandatory.
22
L.R. 16-15.1. The parties have a choice of settlement procedure, but no choice in
23
whether to do it or the timing of it; the settlement conference must be conducted by
24
the date specified by the Court.
25
Therefore, the parties are hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why
26
(1) they failed to conduct their mandatory settlement conference by March 25, 2013,
27
and (2) why each attorney of record should not be sanctioned $1,000 for violating the
28
Court’s July 18, 2012 Order. A written, joint response is due by April 3, 2013. No
1
hearing will be held on this matter. Failure to timely respond may result in additional
2
sanctions, including dismissal or entry of default.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
March 26, 2013
5
6
7
____________________________________
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?