Daniel Torres v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc et al

Filing 15

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE by Judge Otis D. Wright, II:the parties are hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why (1) they failed to conduct their mandatory settlement conference by March 25, 2013, and (2) why each attorney of record should n ot be sanctioned $1,000 for violating the Courts July 18, 2012 Order. A written, joint response is due by April 3, 2013. No hearing will be held on this matter. Failure to timely respond may result in additionalsanctions, including dismissal or entry of default. (lc)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DANIEL TORRES, 12 13 14 v. Plaintiff, Case No. 5:12-cv-424-ODW(DTBx) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE WAL-MARK STORES, INC. et al., Defendants, 15 16 On July 18, 2012, the Court ordered the parties to conduct their settlement 17 conference by March 25, 2013; and the parties selected Settlement Procedure No. 1— 18 settlement proceedings before Magistrate Judge David T. Bristow. (ECF No. 14; 19 Rule 26(f) Report 2.) To date, no settlement proceedings have been held before Judge 20 Bristow. 21 Unless exempted by the Court, the settlement conference is mandatory. 22 L.R. 16-15.1. The parties have a choice of settlement procedure, but no choice in 23 whether to do it or the timing of it; the settlement conference must be conducted by 24 the date specified by the Court. 25 Therefore, the parties are hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why 26 (1) they failed to conduct their mandatory settlement conference by March 25, 2013, 27 and (2) why each attorney of record should not be sanctioned $1,000 for violating the 28 Court’s July 18, 2012 Order. A written, joint response is due by April 3, 2013. No 1 hearing will be held on this matter. Failure to timely respond may result in additional 2 sanctions, including dismissal or entry of default. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 March 26, 2013 5 6 7 ____________________________________ OTIS D. WRIGHT, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?