James Wayne Palmer, Jr et al v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company (DBNTC) et al

Filing 38

ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE by Judge Virginia A. Phillips Re Order to Show Cause 37 : (see document image for specifics). Plaintiffs failed to respond. Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES without prejudice Plaintiffs' Complaint. (ad)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PALMER, JR., et al. 12 13 14 15 16 ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL ) TRUST COMPANY (DBNTC), ) et al. ) ) Defendants. ) ________________________ Case No. EDCV 12-01190 VAP (OPx) ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE 17 18 On November 15, 2012 Plaintiffs James Wayne Palmer, 19 Jr. and Susan Darlene Palmer (collectively, "Plaintiffs") 20 filed a first amended complaint against Deutsche Bank 21 National Trust Company (“Deutsche Bank”), as Trustee for 22 the Registered Holders of Morgan Stanley ABS Capital I 23 Inc. Trust 2007-NC3 Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, 24 Series 2007-NC3 (“Morgan Stanley”), Mortgage Electronic 25 Registration Systems, Inc. (“MERS”), Ocwen Loan 26 Servicing, LLC (“Ocwen”), Regional Trustee Service 27 Corporation (“Regional Trustee”), and New Start Home 28 Loans, Inc. ("New Start") (Doc. No. 25) ("FAC"). 1 2 On January 16, 2013, the Court dismissed Plaintiffs' 3 claims, without leave to amend, against Deutsche Bank, 4 Morgan Stanley, MERS, Ocwen, and Regional Trustee. 5 6 Since then, Plaintiffs have not prosecuted their 7 claims against New Start. On February 21, 2013, this 8 Court issued an Order to Show Cause ("OSC"), no later 9 than March 1, 2013, why the matter should not be 10 dismissed for failure to prosecute as to New Start. 11 Doc. No. 37.) (See Plaintiffs failed to respond. 12 Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES without prejudice 13 Plaintiffs' Complaint. 14 15 16 Dated: March 5, 2013 VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS United States District Judge 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?