Navigator Yachts Inc v. Kenneth R Buck et al

Filing 75

JUDGMENT CONFIRMING ARBITRATOR'S ORDER GRANTING SUNDANCE MFG., INC.'S MOTION FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (jre)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Attorneys for Defendants/Counterclaimants
SUNDANCE MFG., INC.; KENNETH R.
BUCK and KEN STANLEY

8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9
10
11

FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – WESTERN DIVISION
NAVIGATOR YACHTS, INC., a California
corporation,
Plaintiff,

12
13

JS-6

Paul Arenas, Esq., State Bar No. 167863
Henry Wan, Esq., State Bar No. 289911
MARRON LAWYERS
320 Golden Shore, Suite 410
Long Beach, CA 90802
Tel.: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
E-mail: [e-mail]

vs.

16

KENNETH R. BUCK, an individual; KEN
STANLEY, an individual; SUNDANCE
MFG., INC., an Oregon corporation, dba
SUNDANCE YACHT SALES dba
SUNDANCE MARINA dba SUNDANCE
MOORAGE; and DOES 1-10 inclusive,

17

Case No.: 5:12-cv-01420-RSWL (OPx)
JUDGMENT CONFIRMING
ARBITRATOR’S ORDER GRANTING
SUNDANCE MFG., INC.’S MOTION FOR
DECLARATORY RELIEF

Defendants.

14
15

[Filed concurrently with Petition to Confirm
Arbitrator’s Order]

18
19

AND ALL RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS
AND THIRD PARTY CLAIMS

20
21
22
23
24
25

///
///

26
27

///

28

Case No. 5:12-cv-01420-RSWL (OPx)

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT CONFIRMING ARBITRATOR’S ORDER
GRANTING DECLARATORY RELIEF
059405/2012-2070

1

TO ALL PARTIES:

2

Sundance Mfg., Inc. (“Sundance”) and Plaintiff/Counterdefendant Navigator Yachts, Inc.

3

and Counterdefendants Jule Marshall, and Gil Marshall (hereinafter collectively “Parties”) have

4

agreed in the Parties’ Stipulation to Stay Entire Action Pending Binding Arbitration (“Arbitration

5

Agreement”) that the Arbitrator’s Award can be entered by this Court as a final judgment and the

6

Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms thereof. The Arbitrator of the above-entitled

7

matter issued a Final Award on April 12, 2016 granting, among other things, Sundance’s Motion

8

for Declaratory Relief. The Parties have settled all but the Declaratory Relief issue and have

9

agreed that this Court may enter a judgment confirming the Declaratory Relief.

10
11

The binding arbitration of this matter having been concluded and this Court having issued
an order lifting the stay of the action, the Court hereby enters the following Judgment.

12

A JUDGMENT IS HEREBY ENTERED confirming the Arbitrator’s Order Granting

13

Sundance’s Motion for Declaratory Relief, pursuant to 9 U.S.C. § 9 and the Parties’ Arbitration

14

Agreement. A copy of the Arbitrator’s Order Granting Sundance’s Motion for Declaratory Relief

15

is attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference. The Court shall retain

16

jurisdiction to enforce the terms of this Declaratory Relief Judgment.

17
18

Dated: August 18, 2016

19

s/ RONALD S.W. LEW
HON. RONALD S.W. LEW
Senior U.S. District Judge

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1

Case No. 5:12-cv-01420-RSWL (OPx)

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT CONFIRMING ARBITRATOR’S ORDER
GRANTING DECLARATORY RELIEF
059405/2012-2070

EXHIBIT A