Jesus Jimenez v. Jose Ruiz et al
Filing
49
FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Virginia A. Phillips: A jury of eight persons was regularly impaneled and sworn to try the action. The Plaintiff was sworn and testified. Plaintiff rested at the conclusion of his testimony. After Plaintiff rested, the Court c onsidered and granted Defendants' motion for a judgment as a matter of law, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50. reason of the Order described above, NOW, THEREFORE, IT is ADJUGED, ORDERED AN DECREED THAT: 1. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of the Defendants; and 2. Defendants shall recover costs of suit, as taxed by the Clerk. The Court orders that such judgment be entered. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (ad)
SS--
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7 JESUS JIMENEZ, )
8 Plaintiff, )
Case No. EDCV 12-02020
)
VAP (DTBx)
)
FINAL JUGMNT
9 v. )
)
10 JOSE RUIZ, as Sheriffs )
Deputy in his official )
11 and individual )
capacities, JOHN BANNES, )
12 as Sheriffs Detective in)
his official and )
13 individual capacities, )
R. NAQUIN, as Sheriffs )
14 Deputy in his official )
15 and individual )
capacities, DAVID )
FRAYEH, as Sheriffs )
16 Detective in his )
official and individual )
17 capacities, C. )
HARTLEBEN, as Sheriffs )
18 Deputy in his official )
and individual
19LASSITER, as Sheriffs )
capacities, ENO )
)
2 0 Detective in his )
official and individual )
21 capacities, R. PEREZ, as)
Sheriffs Deputy in his )
22 official and individual )
capaci ties, TIM )
23 O'CONNELL, as Sheriffs )
Sergeant in his official)
24 and individual )
capaci ties, EDDIE STARK, )
25 as Sheriffs Sergeant in )
his official and )
2 6 individual capacities, )
and DOES 1-10, )
27 inclusive, )
28 Defendants. )
)
)
1
2 TO ALL PARTIES AN THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
3
This action came on regularly for trial on October 1,
4
2013 in Courtroom 2 of the above entitled Court, the
5
Honorable Virginia A. Phillips, United States District
6
Judge presiding. Plaintiff Jesus Jimenez appeared by his
7
attorney Moises A. Aviles of the law firm Aviles and
8
Associates, and Defendants Jose Ruiz, John Bannes, R.
9
10
11
12
13
Naquin, David Frayeh, C. Hartleben, Eno Lassiter, R.
Perez, Tim 0' Connel, and Eddie Stark appeared by their
attorney David E. Wagner, of the law firm Wagner and
Pelayes, LLP.
14
15
16
17
18
A jury of eight persons was regularly impaneled and
sworn to try the action. The Plaintiff was sworn and
testified. Plaintiff rested at the conclusion of his
testimony.
19
20
21
22
After Plaintiff rested, the Court considered and
granted Defendants' motion for a judgment as a matter of
law, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50.
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
1 By reason of the Order described above, NOW,
2 THEREFORE, IT is ADJUGED, ORDERED AN DECREED THAT:
3
4 1. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of the
5 Defendants; and
6 2. Defendants shall recover costs of suit, as taxed by
7 the Clerk.
8
9 The Court orders that such judgment be entered.
10
11
~.. LvII
12 Dated: Ov i- ÎO~?
VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS
Un ed States District Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?