Brittany M. Peasley v. Michael J. Astrue

Filing 14

JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Wistrich Related to: Memorandum & Opinion 13 . IT IS ADJUDGED that defendant's decision is affirmed in part and reversed in part and remanded in part. See document for details. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (yb)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

EASTERN DIVISION

11
12
13
14
15
16

BRITTANY M. PEASLEY,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
)
Acting Commissioner of the Social
)
Security Administration,
)
)
Defendant.
)
_____________________________________)

Case No. EDCV 12-2105 AJW
JUDGMENT

17
18

IT IS ADJUDGED that defendant’s decision is affirmed in part and reversed and remanded in part.

19

As to the period ending on March 31, 2011, defendant’s decision is affirmed. As to the period beginning

20

on April 1, 2011, defendant’s decision is reversed and remanded for further administrative proceedings and

21

a new hearing decision consistent with the memorandum of decision.

22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23
24
25
26
27
28

November 21, 2013
_________________________
ANDREW J. WISTRICH
United States Magistrate Judge