Gulzar Ahmad v. Peter Shipman et al

Filing 6

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS ORDER REMANDING ACTION TO CALIFORNIA SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE by Judge Virginia A. Phillips: For these reasons, the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction. As Defendant has not met his burden of establishing that the case is properly in federal court, the Court REMANDS the action to the Superior Court of California, County of Riverside. Case Terminated. Made JS-6 (Attachments: # 1 CV103) (am)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION WESTERN DIVISION 411 West Fourth Street, Suite 1053 Santa Ana, CA 92701-4516 (714) 338-4750 312 North Spring Street, Room G-8 Los Angeles, CA 90012 Tel: (213) 894-3535 TERRY NAFISI District Court Executive and Clerk of Court EASTERN DIVISION 3470 Twelfth Street, Room 134 Riverside, CA 92501 (951) 328-4450 December 14, 2012 Superior Court of California County of Riverside 13800 Heacock St. Bldg D #201 Moreno Valley, CA 92553 Re: Case Number: EDCV 12-02138-VAP (SPx) Previously Superior Court Case No. MVC 1205030 Case Name: Gulzar Ahmad v. Peter Shipman et al Dear Sir / Madam: Pursuant to this Court’s ORDER OF REMAND issued on above-referenced case is hereby remanded to your jurisdiction. December 13, 2012 , the Attached is a certified copy of the ORDER OF REMAND and a copy of the docket sheet from this Court. Please acknowledge receipt of the above by signing the enclosed copy of this letter and returning it to our office. Thank you for your cooperation. Respectfully, Clerk, U. S. District Court By: A. Morris Deputy Clerk G Western 951-328-4460 G Eastern $ G Southern Division cc: Counsel of record Receipt is acknowledged of the documents described herein. Clerk, Superior Court Date CV - 103 (09/08) By: Deputy Clerk LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL - REMAND TO SUPERIOR COURT (CIVIL)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?