Guillermina Soto v. Michael J. Astrue
Filing
18
JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the above-captioned action is remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings consistent with the Stipulation to Remand. 17 (es)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR.
United States Attorney
LEON WEIDMAN
Assistant United States Attorney
Chief, Civil Division
ANN L. MALEY, CSBN 176877
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Social Security Administration, Region IX
160 Spear Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, California 94105
Tel: (415) 977-8974
Fax: (415) 744-0134
E-mail: Ann.Maley@ssa.gov
Attorneys for Defendant
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
EASTERN DIVISION
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
GUILLERMINA SOTO,
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN1,
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
19
) Case No. CV 12-2170-PSG (PLA)
)
)
)
) JUDGMENT
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
The Court having approved the parties’ Stipulation to Voluntary Remand
20
21
Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and to Entry of Judgment
22
(“Stipulation to Remand”) that was concurrently lodged, IT IS HEREBY
23
ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the above-captioned action is
24
25
26
27
28
1
Carolyn W. Colvin became the Acting Commissioner of Social Security on February
14, 2013. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Carolyn W.
Colvin should be substituted for Michael J. Astrue as the defendant in this suit. No
further action need be taken to continue this suit by reason of the last sentence of section
205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
-1-
1
remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings
2
consistent with the Stipulation to Remand.
3
4
5
6
DATED: July 9, 2013
HON. PAUL L. ABRAMS
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?