Guillermina Soto v. Michael J. Astrue

Filing 18

JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the above-captioned action is remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings consistent with the Stipulation to Remand. 17 (es)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR. United States Attorney LEON WEIDMAN Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Civil Division ANN L. MALEY, CSBN 176877 Special Assistant United States Attorney Social Security Administration, Region IX 160 Spear Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, California 94105 Tel: (415) 977-8974 Fax: (415) 744-0134 E-mail: Ann.Maley@ssa.gov Attorneys for Defendant 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 GUILLERMINA SOTO, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN1, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. 19 ) Case No. CV 12-2170-PSG (PLA) ) ) ) ) JUDGMENT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) The Court having approved the parties’ Stipulation to Voluntary Remand 20 21 Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and to Entry of Judgment 22 (“Stipulation to Remand”) that was concurrently lodged, IT IS HEREBY 23 ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the above-captioned action is 24 25 26 27 28 1 Carolyn W. Colvin became the Acting Commissioner of Social Security on February 14, 2013. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Carolyn W. Colvin should be substituted for Michael J. Astrue as the defendant in this suit. No further action need be taken to continue this suit by reason of the last sentence of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). -1- 1 remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings 2 consistent with the Stipulation to Remand. 3 4 5 6 DATED: July 9, 2013 HON. PAUL L. ABRAMS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?