Derrick L Hanford v. Michael J Astrue

Filing 7

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 3/13/2013. IT IS ORDERED that, within twenty (20) days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall file a declaration attempting to show cause, if there be any, why this action should not be dismissed for violation of this Courts previous Order and for Plaintiffs failure to prosecute this action. Failure timely to do so may be deemed consent to the dismissal of this action. (rp)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15
16

DERRICK L. HANFORD,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER
)
OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
)
)
)
Defendant.
)
___________________________________)

NO. ED CV 12-2211-DMG(E)
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE
DISMISSAL FOR FAILURE TO
PROSECUTE

17
18

By Order filed January 3, 2013, the Court directed Plaintiff to

19

file a proof of service of the Summons and Complaint within thirty

20

(30) days of the date of that Order.

21

proof of service has been filed.

As of the present date, no such

22
23

IT IS ORDERED that, within twenty (20) days of the date of this

24

Order, Plaintiff shall file a declaration attempting to show cause, if

25

there be any, why this action should not be dismissed for violation of

26

this Court’s previous Order and for Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute

27

this action.

28

///

See Link v. Wabash R.R., 370 U.S. 626, 629-30 (1952).

1

Failure timely to do so may be deemed consent to the dismissal of this

2

action.

3
4

DATED:

February 21, 2013.

5
6
7
8

_______________/S/__________________
CHARLES F. EICK
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2