TMI Products Inc v. Rosen Entertainment Systems LP

Filing 149

JUDGMENT by Judge R. Gary Klausner. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: that Plaintiff shall take nothing from Defendant by way of this action, and that judgment for Defendant is granted. (shb)

Download PDF
1 BARCELÓ, HARRISON & WALKER, LLP Reynaldo C. Barceló, CA State Bar No. 199741 2 E-mail: rey@bhiplaw.com 2901 West Coast Hwy, Suite 200 3 Newport Beach, California 92663 Telephone: (949) 340-9736 NOTE: CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT 4 Facsimile: (949) 258-5752 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant, TMI Products, Inc. 6 KOLISCH HARTWELL, P.C. 7 Owen W. Dukelow, CA State Bar No. 196265 email: owen@khpatent.com 8 David P. Cooper, Oregon Bar No. 880367 (admitted pro hac vice) email: cooper@khpatent.com 9 Desmond J. Kidney, Oregon Bar No. 131558 (admitted pro hac vice) email: desmond@khpatent.com 10 260 Sheridan Avenue, Suite 200 Palo Alto, California 94306 11 Telephone: (503) 224-6655 Facsimile: (503) 295-6679 12 Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff 13 Rosen Electronics, L.P., f/k/a Rosen Entertainment Systems, L.P. 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 17 TMI PRODUCTS, INC., Plaintiff, 18 19 Case No. 5:12-cv-02263-RGK-SP [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT v. 20 ROSEN ELECTRONICS, L.P., f/k/a 21 ROSEN ENTERTAINMENT SYSTEMS, L.P. 22 Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff, 23 24 v. 25 26 27 TMI PRODUCTS, INC., Counterclaim Defendant. 28 [Proposed] Judgment 1 For the reasons stated in: 2  the Court’s Order Granting Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary 3 Judgment on Defendant’s patent invalidity counterclaim, dated 4 November 27, 2013 (Dkt. No. 61), 5  the Court’s Order on the Parties’ Joint Stipulation Regarding Dismissal 6 of Certain Claims and Counterclaims, dated March 14, 2014 (Dkt. No. 7 70), 8  the Court’s Order Granting Defendant’s Motion for Summary 9 Judgment of Non-Infringement, Denying Plaintiff’s Motion for 10 Summary Judgment of Infringement and Motion for Preliminary 11 Injunction, and Denying Without Prejudice Plaintiff’s Motion for 12 Partial Summary Judgment on Defendant’s Ownership Counterclaim, 13 dated April 30, 2014 (Dkt. No. 133), and 14 15  the Court’s Order Dismissing Plaintiff’s Breach of Contract Claim Without Prejudice, dated May 9, 2014 (Dkt. No. 147); 16 IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 17 that Plaintiff shall take nothing from Defendant by way of this action, and 18 that judgment for Defendant is granted. 19 20 Dated: May 23, 2014 21 __________________________________ Hon. R. Gary Klausner United States District Court Judge 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2[Proposed] Judgment

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?