Dominic O Ehirim v. San Bernardino County Probation Department

Filing 40

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 37 by Judge Jesus G. Bernal: Having made a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made, the Court concurs with and accepts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that petitioners request for an evidentiary hearing is denied and that Judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice. (ad)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 DOMINIC O. EHIRIM, vs. Petitioner, 14 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT, 15 Respondent. 16 17 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. EDCV 13-0090-JGB (DTB) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all the records 18 and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate 19 Judge. Objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed herein. Having 20 made a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation 21 to which objections have been made, the Court concurs with and accepts the findings, 22 conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. 23 IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that petitioner’s request for an evidentiary 24 hearing is denied and that Judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing 25 this action with prejudice. 26 27 28 Dated: November 26, 2014 _______________________________ JESUS G. BERNAL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?