Chris Johnson v. Nutrapure Inc et al

Filing 10

MEMORANDUM: (In Chambers) Order REMANDING Case to State Court: This case was removed based on diversity jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441(b). The notice of removal does not establish that the named plaintiff or any othersingle class mem ber individually has a claim that exceeds $75,000. See Eagle v. Am. Tel. & Tel. Co., 769 F.2d 541, 545 (9th Cir. 1985). Therefore, the case is REMANDED to the Superior Court of California, County of Riverside IT IS SO ORDERED by Judge Dale S. Fischer (cc Copy of Memorandum, Docket sheet and Letter of Remand sent to Riverside Superior Court, Case number RIC 1300505) (Case Terminated. Made JS-6) (Attachments: # 1 Letter of Remand - CV 103) (ir)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MEMORANDUM
JS 6
Case No.
Title

Date

EDCV 13-300 DSF (SPx)

3/5/13

Chris Johnson v. Nutrapure, Inc.

Present: The
Honorable

DALE S. FISCHER, United States District Judge

Debra Plato
Deputy Clerk

Not Present
Court Reporter

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:

Attorneys Present for Defendants:

Not Present

Not Present

Proceedings:

(In Chambers) Order REMANDING Case to State Court

This case was removed based on diversity jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
1441(b). The notice of removal does not establish that the named plaintiff – or any other
single class member – individually has a claim that exceeds $75,000. See Eagle v. Am.
Tel. & Tel. Co., 769 F.2d 541, 545 (9th Cir. 1985). Therefore, the case is REMANDED
to the Superior Court of California, County of Riverside.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

CV-90 (12/02)

MEMORANDUM

Page 1 of 1