Thomas M Urioste v. Ian Burns et al
Filing
29
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH COURT ORDER by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 9/8/2014. [See Order for details.] (san)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No.
EDCV 13-0440-VBF (JEM)
Title
Thomas Urioste v. Ian Burns, et al.
Present: The
Honorable
Date
August 19, 2014
John E. McDermott, United States Magistrate Judge
S. Anthony
Deputy Clerk
Court Reporter / Recorder
Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:
Attorneys Present for Defendants:
None
None
Proceedings:
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE FAILURE
TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH
COURT ORDER
On May 1, 2014, the Court issued an Order requiring “[e]ach party [to] . . . file and
serve a status report on August 1, 2014.” (Docket No. 26 at 2) (bold and underline
omitted). As of this date, Plaintiff has not filed his status report.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Plaintiff SHOW CAUSE why
this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and/or failure to comply with
a court order for failing to file a status report as directed by the Court’s Order of May 1,
2014. Plaintiff shall respond to this Order to Show Cause in writing on or before
September 8, 2014.
In responding, Plaintiff must either (1) file a status report as directed by the Court’s
Order of May 1, 2014, or (2) explain why he has failed to do so.
Plaintiff is advised that failure to respond to this Order to Show Cause as directed
may result in the Court recommending that the case be dismissed for failure to prosecute
and/or failure to comply with a court order. See Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626,
629-30 (1962); Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
cc: Parties
:
Initials of Preparer
CV-90 (10/08)
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
sa
Page 1 of 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?