Quinton Gray et al v. County of Riverside

Filing 173

CONSENT DECREE by Judge Virginia A. Phillips Related to: STIPULATION for Order Approving Consent Decree 172 . Therefore and good cause appearing, the Court approves this Consent Decree, orders the parties to comply with all its terms, and orders Defendant to implement the attached Remedial Plan pursuant to the schedule set forth therein. (See document for specifics.) (iva)

1
2
3
4
5

JS-6

6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
EASTERN DIVISION - RIVERSIDE

8
9
10
11
12

QUINTON GRAY, et al.
Plaintiffs,

13
14
15
16
17

v.

Case No. EDCV 13-0444 VAP (OPx)

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE,

CONSENT DECREE

Defendants.

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CASE NO. EDCV12-0444 VAP (OP)

1
2
3

Introduction
1.

The parties enter into this Consent Decree to ensure the provision of

4

constitutional health care and to ensure non-discrimination for inmates with disabilities

5

in the Riverside County Jails.1 The parties to this Consent Decree are Plaintiffs Quinton

6
7

Gray, Angela Patterson, Stanley Kujawsky, John Rosson III, Brandy McClellan, Julie

8

Miller, Michael Wolhfeil, David Madrid, and Nikko Quarles and the class and

9

subclasses of inmates they represent, and the Defendant County of Riverside.

10
11

2.

This action was filed by Plaintiffs on March 8, 2013. A Second Amended

12

Complaint was filed on August 20, 2014, and a Third Amended Complaint on

13

November 24, 2015. The action alleges that the County of Riverside fails to provide

14
15

minimally adequate medical and mental health care to the people incarcerated in its

16

jails, in violation of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United Constitution,

17

as well as discrimination against certain inmates with disabilities in violation of the

18
19

Americans with Disabilities Act and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act. On

20

September 2, 2014, the Court denied Defendant’s motion to dismiss and granted

21

Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification.

22
23

3.

The Plaintiff class consists of “all prisoners who are now, or will be in the

24
25
26
27
28

1

For the purposes of this Consent Decree, references to the Riverside Jails
include the five jails (Presley Detention Center, Smith Correctional Facility, Southwest
Detention Center, Indio Jail, and Blythe Jail) as well as the Riverside University
Medical Center, to the extent it houses inmates under the jurisdiction of the Riverside
County Sheriff, and any new structures designated to house prisoners under the
jurisdiction of the Riverside County Sheriff subsequent to the date of this Consent
Decree.
1
Case No. EDCV12-0444 VAP (OP)

1
2
3

future, subjected to the medical and mental health policies and practices of Riverside
County.” The medical subclass comprises “[a]ll prisoners who are now, or will in the

4

future be, subjected to the medical care policies and practices of the Riverside Jails” and

5

the mental health subclass comprises “[a]ll prisoners who are now, or will in the future

6
7

be, subjected to the mental health care policies and practices of the Riverside Jails.” In

8

addition, the parties hereby stipulate to an additional subclass of all prisoners who are

9

now, or will be in the future, subjected to policies and practices of the Riverside jails

10
11

regarding specialized or sheltered housing for prisoners due to their mobility

12

impairments and need for assistive devices, and the provision and confiscation of

13

accommodations for prisoners with mobility impairments, and agree that this class

14
15
16
17

meets the requirements of Rule 23(a) and (b) of the federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
4.

In January 2015, the parties suspended regular and expert discovery for the

purpose of settlement negotiations. To aid in settlement negotiations, the parties agreed

18
19

on February 20, 2015, to hire neutral experts “to determine whether the health care

20

currently provided poses a significant risk of serious harm to prisoners confined in the

21

Jails and, if so, to make recommendations for improvements that will provide the

22
23
24
25

minimum care guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution.” Should the experts determine that
health care does fail to meet the constitutional minimum, the parties agreed to negotiate
a Remedial Plan to address the identified deficiencies, including a commitment to

26
27
28

secure funding necessary for implementation of the Remedial Plan and a timeframe for
implementation. The parties further agreed that the Court would retain jurisdiction to
2
Case No. EDCV12-0444 VAP (OP)

1
2
3

enforce the terms of its judgment and Plaintiffs would be prevailing party.
5.

The parties jointly selected Dr. Scott Allen, Professor of Medicine at the

4

University of California-Riverside, as the expert on medical care and Dr. Bruce Gage,

5

Chief Psychiatrist of the Washington State Department of Corrections, as the expert on

6
7
8
9

mental health care. The parties directed them to begin their work on March 3, 2015.
6.

Both experts conducted extensive tours and reviews of the jail facilities,

policies and procedures as well as interviews with staff and inmates. They drafted

10
11

preliminary reports setting forth their findings and recommendations, and both parties

12

were given the opportunity to review the reports and make comments. The experts

13

submitted their final reports to the parties on July 15, 2015.

14
15

7.

Each party to this Consent Decree was represented by counsel during its

16

negotiation and execution. Plaintiffs and the Plaintiff classes and subclasses are

17

represented by Donald Specter and Sara Norman, Prison Law Office, and Shawn

18
19

Hanson and Danielle Ginty, Akin Gump. Defendant is represented by Arthur

20

Cunningham, Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, and James Brown, Assistant County

21

Counsel for the County of Riverside.

22
23
24
25

8.

Through this Consent Decree, Defendant agrees to implement the measures

set forth in the Remedial Plan attached as Appendix A, subject to monitoring by the
Court experts and Plaintiffs’ counsel, negotiation between the parties, and if necessary,

26
27

enforcement by the Court.

28
3
Case No. EDCV12-0444 VAP (OP)

1
2
3

Remedial Plan
9.

Defendant shall fully implement all of the remedial measures, according to

4

the specified timeframes, set forth in the Remedial Plan attached as Appendix A.

5

Defendant shall secure the funding necessary to implement the Remedial Plan. The

6
7

Remedial Plan is designed to meet the minimum level of health care necessary to fulfill

8

Defendant’s obligations under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, as well as to

9

ensure non-discrimination against inmates with disabilities in the areas addressed by the

10
11
12
13

Plan, as required by the ADA and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act.
10.

Defendant shall, in consultation and collaboration with Plaintiffs’ counsel,

develop and implement appropriate and adequate plans, policies, and practices to ensure

14
15

compliance with the Remedial Plan. At least 30 days prior to finalizing or

16

implementing any new plans or policies developed to meet the terms of the Remedial

17

Plan, Defendant will submit such plans or policies to Plaintiffs’ counsel for their review

18
19
20
21

and comments. Disagreements about the adequacy of such plans or policies shall be
resolved pursuant to the dispute resolution procedure set forth below.
11.

Defendant may seek to modify the Remedial Plan if they believe in good

22
23
24
25

faith that there is a significant change in the facts or the law such that the terms of the
Remedial Plan will not effectively accomplish the goals set forth in Paragraph 1.
Defendant’s violations. Plaintiffs may seek to modify the Remedial Plan if the plan

26
27
28

does not effectively accomplish those goals, or a modification is necessary to ensure
Plaintiff class members receive adequate healthcare under the Eighth and Fourteenth
4
Case No. EDCV12-0444 VAP (OP)

1
2
3

Amendment to the United States Constitution or to ensure that inmates are not subjected
to disability discrimination under the ADA and/or Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act

4

in the areas covered by the Plan. Any party wishing to modify the plan must submit a

5

proposed modification to the opposing party. The opposing party may request further

6
7

information, request that the modification(s) be reviewed by the Court’s experts, and/or

8

request that the proposed modification(s) be subjected to the dispute resolution process

9

described below. If the parties fail to reach agreement on the proposed modification(s),

10
11
12
13

the party proposing the modification(s) may seek relief from the Court.
12.

Within 180 calendar days of the date this Consent Decree is approved by

the Court, Defendant shall provide to Plaintiffs’ counsel a status report stating whether

14
15

it is complying with the terms of this Consent Decree. This report shall include a

16

description of the steps that Defendant has taken to implement the Remedial Plan. At

17

the end of each subsequent 180-day period during the pendency of this Consent Decree,

18
19
20
21

Defendant shall provide to Plaintiffs’ counsel a status report addressing each item of the
Remedial Plan and shall specify each and every item with which it is not in compliance.
Court Experts

22
23
24
25

13.

The parties jointly request the appointment of Drs. Gage and Allen as

Court experts pursuant to Rule 706 of the Federal Rules of Evidence to advise the Court
on the County’s compliance or non-compliance with the Remedial Plan, dispute resolution

26
27
28

matters addressed in paragraph (4), and testimony, if required, as addressed in paragraph (6),
below. . During the first year of this Consent Decree, the Court experts shall complete

5
Case No. EDCV12-0444 VAP (OP)

1
2
3

two comprehensive reviews and reports, at least four months apart, to advise the parties
and the Court on Defendant’s progress in implementing the Remedial Plan. For the

4

remaining duration of this Consent Decree, the Court experts shall complete

5

comprehensive reviews and reports as they determine to be necessary, or as requested

6
7

by the parties, but not more than twice in one year, to advise the parties and the Court

8

on Defendant’s compliance or non-compliance with the Remedial Plan. These

9

comprehensive reviews and reports shall be considered separate and apart from any

10
11
12
13

evaluations and reports prepared as part of the dispute resolution process described
below.
14.

The experts’ duties specified in Appendix B shall be provided to the

14
15
16
17

experts pursuant to Rule 706(b). The Court experts shall be entitled to reasonable
compensation in an amount approved by the Court, which shall be paid by Defendant.
15.

The Court experts shall have reasonable access to all parts of any Riverside

18
19

Jail, with appropriate notice, and access to the facilities will not be unreasonably

20

restricted. The experts shall have access to correctional and health care staff and

21

inmates, including confidential and voluntary interviews as they deem appropriate. The

22
23
24
25

experts shall also have access to documents, including budgetary, custody, and health
care documents, and institutional meetings, proceedings, and programs to the extent the
experts determine such access is needed to fulfill their obligations. The experts’ tours

26
27
28

shall be undertaken in a manner that does not unreasonably interfere with jail operations
as determined by jail administrators.
6
Case No. EDCV12-0444 VAP (OP)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

16.

The parties agree that they are each entitled to engage in ex parte

communications with the Court experts. However, all of the experts’ findings and
recommendations shall be set forth in writing in their reports.
17.

If for any reason either one is not appointed or can no longer serve, the

parties shall attempt to agree on who shall be appointed in their place. If the parties do

8

not agree, Defendant and Plaintiffs shall each nominate and submit two potential experts

9

to be chosen and appointed by the Court.

10
11
12
13

Notice to Class Members
18.

Defendant shall post notices of this action in a manner agreed upon by the

parties. Such notices shall include a brief description of Plaintiffs’ claims, the definition

14
15

of the classes and subclasses, that the parties have entered into a Consent Decree to

16

ensure constitutional medical and mental health care for the Plaintiff class, as well as to

17

ensure non-discrimination as to inmates with disabilities in certain areas, and the contact

18
19
20
21

information for the Prison Law Office to allow inmates to contact Plaintiffs’ counsel.
Plaintiffs’ Monitoring and Access to Information
19.

Plaintiffs shall monitor Defendant’s compliance with the Remedial Plan.

22
23
24
25

Plaintiffs shall inform Defendant of alleged noncompliance with any aspect of the
Remedial Plan. Defendant shall investigate alleged failures and provide Plaintiffs with
a response in writing within 30 calendar days. If Plaintiffs are not satisfied with

26
27
28

Defendant’s response, the parties shall engage in the dispute resolution process
described below.
7
Case No. EDCV12-0444 VAP (OP)

1
2
3

20.

Defendant shall provide Plaintiffs with access to information, including all

Riverside Jail facilities, documents, records, and staff, that Plaintiffs believe in good

4

faith is necessary to monitor Defendant’s compliance with the Remedial Plan. From the

5

date this Consent Decree is entered by the Court, Defendant shall provide Plaintiffs with

6
7

access to such information within 15 calendar days of their request. If Defendant

8

believes that the information requested by Plaintiffs is not necessary to monitor

9

compliance with the Remedial Plan, the parties shall engage in the dispute resolution

10
11
12
13

process described below.
21.

Defendant shall grant Plaintiffs and their consultants the opportunity to

conduct at least two tours of the Riverside Jails per calendar year for the purpose of

14
15

monitoring compliance with the Remedial Plan. Tours by Plaintiffs and/or their

16

consultants shall include reasonable access to all of the jail facilities, including all

17

housing units, facilities where health care services are provided, facilities where inmates

18
19

with disabilities are or may be housed and provided programming, and any other

20

facilities where services are provided pursuant to the Remedial Plan. During the tours,

21

Defendant shall make available for interview any supervisory, clinical, custodial, and

22
23
24
25

program staff that have direct or supervisory responsibility for health care and disability
accommodations. Defendant shall provide a Sheriff’s Department contact person to
ensure cooperation of institution staff with Plaintiffs in obtaining information they

26
27
28

request during the tours. During the tours, Defendant shall permit and facilitate
Plaintiffs having confidential and voluntary discussions with any inmate identified by
8
Case No. EDCV12-0444 VAP (OP)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Plaintiffs. Upon request by Plaintiffs and pursuant to the protective order entered in this
case, Defendant shall make available for inspection and/or copying the health care
and/or custody files of specified inmates.
22.

In the event that Defendant fails to make the employee or an agent

requested by Plaintiffs available for an interview, the parties shall seek a determination

8

from Judge Raul Ramirez by telephone as to whether Plaintiffs may depose the

9

employee or agent who has not been made available. The parties agree that should such

10
11

a deposition be required, the employee or agent shall be compelled to attend by

12

subpoena, and the deposition may be taken in Riverside County without further leave of

13

the Court.

14
15

23.

Plaintiffs’ counsel retain the ability to interview their clients pursuant to

16

regular attorney-client visiting procedures established by the Sheriff’s Department. The

17

parties will attempt to establish an efficient means to allow Plaintiffs’ counsel

18
19
20
21

confidential telephonic interviews with individual inmates, with reasonable notice, in a
manner that does not disrupt jail operations.
24.

Plaintiffs’ counsel shall be allowed to send postage pre-paid envelopes to

22
23
24
25

their clients in the Riverside Jails.
Individual Advocacy
25.

Plaintiffs may bring individual inmates’ health care or disability

26
27
28

accommodation concerns to the attention of Defendant’s counsel, or their designee, who
shall respond in writing within seven calendar days. This process is not meant to
9
Case No. EDCV12-0444 VAP (OP)

1
2
3

replace or circumvent the existing processes for requesting medical or mental health
services, or the existing grievance processes. Inmates will be encouraged to make use

4

of those processes except where exigent circumstances or failures of those processes

5

have occurred.

6
7
8
9

Dispute Resolution
26.

At the request of any party, the parties shall conduct good faith

negotiations to resolve informally any matter in dispute, including but not limited to any

10
11

contention that Defendant is not substantially complying as required by this Consent

12

Decree or the Remedial Plan(s), or any contention that Defendant has demonstrated

13

sufficient compliance with the Consent Decree and/or Remedial Plan(s) that the Consent

14
15

Decree and monitoring thereunder should be modified or terminated. Any party may

16

begin this dispute resolution process by telephonic notice to the opposing party. The

17

parties shall speak on the telephone or in person to attempt to resolve the dispute.

18
19

27.

If the parties are unable to resolve the dispute within 30 days of the original

20

notice, either party may inform the relevant Court experts of the area of disagreement

21

and request that the experts evaluate the issue and prepare a report. The experts must

22
23
24
25

provide their report regarding the area of disagreement within 30 days of the request.
Defendant will pay the experts’ reasonable fees for any reports prepared by a Court
expert at the request of a party about a disputed issue, as contemplated by this

26
27
28

paragraph. Any report prepared by a Court expert at the request of a party about a
disputed issue, as contemplated by this paragraph, shall be admissible as evidence at the
10
Case No. EDCV12-0444 VAP (OP)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

request of any party in any judicial proceeding in this case, subject to appropriate
objections pursuant to the Federal Rules of Evidence.
28.

If within 30 calendar days of receipt of the Court experts’ report, the parties

are unable to reach a mutually satisfactory resolution of the dispute, either party may
request mediation with Judge Raul Ramirez. The form of the mediation (whether in

8

person or by telephone, timeframes, and any briefing to be provided) shall be

9

established by Judge Ramirez after consultation with the parties.

10
11

29.

If mediation with Judge Ramirez does not resolve the dispute to the mutual

12

satisfaction of the parties, either party may file a motion for relief to the Court of

13

continuing jurisdiction.

14
15
16
17

Enforcement
30.

The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of this Consent

Decree, and shall have the power to enforce the agreement through specific performance

18
19

and all other remedies permitted by law until Defendant fulfills its obligations under this

20

Consent Decree.

21

Duration and Termination

22
23
24
25

31.

The duration of this Consent Decree is four years from the date this

Consent Decree is entered by the Court, except that this time period may be extended as
to any provision of this Consent Decree with which the Defendant is not in substantial

26
27
28

compliance for so long as substantial non-compliance persists. Any such extension not
mutually agreed upon by the parties shall be subject to the dispute resolution process set
11
Case No. EDCV12-0444 VAP (OP)

1
2
3

forth above.
32.

Defendant shall not file a termination motion pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §

4

3626(b)(1)(A)(i) for three years from the date this Consent Decree is entered by the

5

Court. Any termination motion shall be based on a record of no less than one year of

6
7

substantial compliance with all the requirements of this Consent Decree and the

8

Remedial Plan.

9

33.

Defendant may request a finding that Defendant is in substantial

10
11

compliance with the Remedial Plan or a material component (defined as one of the (20)

12

subparts of the Remedial Plan) thereof and has maintained substantial compliance for a

13

period of twelve months. Such a finding will result in a reduction or suspension of

14
15

monitoring of that material component. If Plaintiffs present evidence that Defendant is

16

no longer in substantial compliance with material component(s) previously found in

17

substantial compliance, the Court may order additional relief including but not limited

18
19

to reinstating full monitoring.

20

Costs and Fees

21

34.

Costs and Fees For Monitoring and Enforcement: Plaintiffs shall be

22
23
24
25

compensated for their reasonable time and reasonable expenses relating to monitoring
and enforcing this Consent Decree and Remedial Plan. For monitoring fees and
expenses, Plaintiffs shall submit a detailed invoice for their fees and expenses (including

26
27
28

the date, amount of time spent, and a general description of each task) at the end of
every quarter and Defendant shall pay the amount requested by Plaintiffs within 60
12
Case No. EDCV12-0444 VAP (OP)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

calendar days of receipt of each invoice, provided that Defendant need not pay any fees
and expenses that exceed $150,000 per calendar year.
35.

In addition, and notwithstanding the monetary limit set forth above,

Defendant agrees to pay Plaintiffs’ counsel for reasonable time and expenses in
connection with efforts to resolve informally or through mediation or litigation any

8

dispute related to this Consent Decree and Remedial Plan, subject to Defendant’s right

9

to dispute any such request for compensation, as provided in the dispute resolution

10
11
12
13

mechanism set forth above.
36.

For any tasks related to monitoring and enforcing this Consent Decree and

Remedial Plan that relate to health care, Defendant shall pay Plaintiffs at hourly rates set

14
15

forth under the PLRA, 42 U.S.C. Section 1997e. For any tasks related to monitoring

16

and enforcing this Consent Decree and Remedial Plan that relate to ensuring non-

17

discrimination based on disability, Defendant shall pay Plaintiffs pursuant to the ADA

18
19
20
21

and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act.
37.

Costs and Fees Prior to Entry of the Consent Decree: The parties agree

that, by entry of this Consent Decree, Plaintiffs are the prevailing party in this litigation.

22
23
24
25

As a result, Defendant agrees to pay Plaintiffs their reasonable fees and costs, subject to
the provisions of the PLRA, 42 U.S.C. Section 1997e, including its limitations as to
hourly rates as applicable. Defendant agrees to pay Plaintiffs $1,250,000 for reasonable

26
27
28

fees and expenses incurred through Final Approval of the Consent Decree, including
approval of all Remediation Plan(s). The parties acknowledge that Court approval of the
13
Case No. EDCV12-0444 VAP (OP)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

fees and expenses is required.
Liability and Necessity for Relief
38.

Defendant admits for the purpose of this lawsuit only that there exists

probable cause to believe that violations of the federal rights of plaintiffs have occurred
sufficient to warrant the relief contained herein. The parties agree that the relief

8

contained herein is narrowly drawn, extends no further than necessary to ensure the

9

protection of the federal constitutional and statutory rights of Plaintiffs, and is the least

10
11
12

intrusive means necessary to accomplish those objectives.
IT IS SO AGREED AND STIPULATED.

13
14
15

DATED: November 24, 2015

LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH

LLP

16
17

By:

18
19

/s/ Arthur K. Cunningham
Arthur K. Cunningham
Attorneys for Defendant,
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE

20
21

IT IS SO AGREED AND STIPULATED.

22
23

DATED: November 24, 2015

PRISON LAW OFFICE

24
25
26
27

By:

/s/ Sara Norman
Sara Norman
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

28
14
Case No. EDCV12-0444 VAP (OP)

1

ORDER

2
3
4

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties and following careful review of the
expert reports filed under separate cover and the Third Amended Complaint, the Court

5
6

hereby certifies a subclass of all prisoners who are now, or will be in the future,

7

subjected to policies and practices of the Riverside jails regarding specialized or

8

sheltered housing for prisoners due to their mobility impairments and need for assistive

9
10

devices, and the provision and confiscation of accommodations for prisoners with

11

mobility impairments.

12
13

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties and following careful review of the

14

expert reports filed under separate cover, and as mandated by 18 U.S.C. Section 3626,

15

the Court hereby finds that the remedy set forth herein is narrowly drawn, extends no

16
17
18
19

further than necessary to correct the violation of the federal rights, and is the least
intrusive means necessary to correct the violation of the federal rights.
Therefore and good cause appearing, the Court approves this Consent Decree,

20
21
22

orders the parties to comply with all its terms, and orders Defendant to implement the
attached Remedial Plan pursuant to the schedule set forth therein.

23
24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25
26
27
28

Dated: June 07, 2016
______________________________
The Honorable Virginia A. Phillips
U.S. District Court Judge
15
Case No. EDCV12-0444 VAP (OP)