Tom P Wilson et al v. US Investigations Services LLC et al
Filing
17
ORDER VACATING ALL MOTIONS AND APPLICATIONS AND SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE for 8/5/2013 3:30 PM. 12 , 15 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson (lc). Modified on 6/11/2013. (lc).
1
2
O
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
TOM P. WILSON, ET AL.,
12
13
14
15
16
Plaintiff,
v.
US INVESTIGATIONS SERVICES,
LLC; ALTEGRITY, INC.,
PROVIDENCE EQUITY PARTNERS,
LLC, CHESTER RIGGINS;
CAROLINE ASHLEY; MICHAEL
MANDELBLATT; HEIDI NIELSEN,
17
18
19
Defendants.
___________________________
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. EDCV 13-00489 DDP (PLAx)
ORDER VACATING ALL MOTIONS AND
APPLICATIONS AND SETTING
SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
[Dkt. Nos. 12 & 15]
Before the court is Defendant US Investigations Services,
20
LLC’s Ex Parte Application.
21
all pending motions.
22
subpoenas that have been issued.
23
the requirement under Local Rule 23-3 that Plaintiff file a motion
24
for class certification within 90 days of filing his complaint.
25
A new deadline for the class certification motion shall be
The court VACATES without prejudice
The court VACATES without prejudice all
The court relieves Plaintiff of
26
submitted for approval by the court at the scheduling conference.
27
The scheduling conference is set for Monday, August 5, 2013 at
28
3:30 p.m. in Courtroom 3, before the Honorable Dean D. Pregerson,
1
located at 312 North Spring Street, Los Angeles, California
2
90012.
3
Civil Procedure 16(b).
4
scheduling conference.
5
The conference will be held pursuant to Federal Rules of
Lead trial counsel shall attend the
The parties are reminded of their obligations to disclose
6
information and confer on a discovery plan not later than
7
twenty-one (21) days prior to the scheduling conference and file a
8
report with the Court entitled "Rule 26(f) Report", not later than
9
fourteen (14) days after they confer as required by Federal Rule
10
of Civil Procedure 26 and the Local Rules of this Court. The
11
parties are ordered to meet and confer to prepare the joint 26(f)
12
report and jointly propose trial and pretrial dates for the
13
court’s approval.
14
result in sanctions.
15
pending issues without judicial involvement to the greatest extent
16
possible.
Failure to meet and confer in good faith will
The court expects the parties to resolve all
17
18
IT IS SO ORDERED.
19
20
21
Dated:
June 11, 2013
DEAN D. PREGERSON
United States District Judge
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?