Tom P Wilson et al v. US Investigations Services LLC et al

Filing 17

ORDER VACATING ALL MOTIONS AND APPLICATIONS AND SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE for 8/5/2013 3:30 PM. 12 , 15 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson (lc). Modified on 6/11/2013. (lc).

Download PDF
1 2 O 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TOM P. WILSON, ET AL., 12 13 14 15 16 Plaintiff, v. US INVESTIGATIONS SERVICES, LLC; ALTEGRITY, INC., PROVIDENCE EQUITY PARTNERS, LLC, CHESTER RIGGINS; CAROLINE ASHLEY; MICHAEL MANDELBLATT; HEIDI NIELSEN, 17 18 19 Defendants. ___________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. EDCV 13-00489 DDP (PLAx) ORDER VACATING ALL MOTIONS AND APPLICATIONS AND SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE [Dkt. Nos. 12 & 15] Before the court is Defendant US Investigations Services, 20 LLC’s Ex Parte Application. 21 all pending motions. 22 subpoenas that have been issued. 23 the requirement under Local Rule 23-3 that Plaintiff file a motion 24 for class certification within 90 days of filing his complaint. 25 A new deadline for the class certification motion shall be The court VACATES without prejudice The court VACATES without prejudice all The court relieves Plaintiff of 26 submitted for approval by the court at the scheduling conference. 27 The scheduling conference is set for Monday, August 5, 2013 at 28 3:30 p.m. in Courtroom 3, before the Honorable Dean D. Pregerson, 1 located at 312 North Spring Street, Los Angeles, California 2 90012. 3 Civil Procedure 16(b). 4 scheduling conference. 5 The conference will be held pursuant to Federal Rules of Lead trial counsel shall attend the The parties are reminded of their obligations to disclose 6 information and confer on a discovery plan not later than 7 twenty-one (21) days prior to the scheduling conference and file a 8 report with the Court entitled "Rule 26(f) Report", not later than 9 fourteen (14) days after they confer as required by Federal Rule 10 of Civil Procedure 26 and the Local Rules of this Court. The 11 parties are ordered to meet and confer to prepare the joint 26(f) 12 report and jointly propose trial and pretrial dates for the 13 court’s approval. 14 result in sanctions. 15 pending issues without judicial involvement to the greatest extent 16 possible. Failure to meet and confer in good faith will The court expects the parties to resolve all 17 18 IT IS SO ORDERED. 19 20 21 Dated: June 11, 2013 DEAN D. PREGERSON United States District Judge 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?