David Lotich v. Lowe's HIW Inc et al

Filing 13

AGREED ORDER OF PROTECTION by Magistrate Judge David T. Bristow (am) Modified on 5/3/2013 (am). 12

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 CHARLES D. MAY, ESQ.; STATE BAR NO.: 129663 GENE B. SHARAGA, ESQ.; STATE BAR NO.: 131661 THARPE & HOWELL, LLP 15250 Ventura Blvd,, Ninth Floor Sherman Oaks, California 91403 (818) 205-9955; (818) 205-9944 fax E-Mail: cmay@tharpe-howell.com E-Mail: gsharaga@tharpe-howell.com Attorneys for Defendant, LOWE’S HIW, INC. 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – EASTERN DIVISION 9 THARPE & HOWELL, LLP 15250 Ventura Boulevard, Ninth Floor Sherman Oaks, California 91403-3221 10 DAVID LOTICH, CASE NO.: EDCV13- 536 SVW(DTBx) (San Bernardino County Superior Court Case No.: CIVDS 1209528) Plaintiff, 11 12 vs. 13 LOWE’S HIW, INC., DOES 1-10, inclusive, 14 AGREED ORDER OF PROTECTION Defendants. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 It appearing to the Court that the Plaintiff and Defendant are in agreement that Lowe’s HIW, Inc. (hereinafter “the Defendant”) possesses proprietary policies and procedures, as well as personnel files of present and former employees, that include confidential information that may be subject to discovery in the proceedings in this matter but which should not be made available to the public generally, this Court hereby orders that: 1. All documents produced or information disclosed and any other documents or records designated as “confidential” by the Defendant shall be revealed only to Plaintiff, counsel of record in this case, paralegals and secretarial employees under counsel’s direct supervision, and such persons as are employed by counsel to act as experts in this action. The information considered as “confidential” and disclosed only in accord with the terms of this paragraph shall include, without limitation, all of the Defendant’s policies-and procedures, as well as personnel 1AGREED ORDER OF PROTECTION Lotich v. Lowe’s HIW, Inc. Case No.: EDCV13536SVW(DTBx) 1 2 3 records, including disciplinary records, identity, or any other information or documentation supplied by the Defendant in response to Plaintiff’s Interrogatories or Requests for Production. 4 5 6 7 8 9 THARPE & HOWELL, LLP 15250 Ventura Boulevard, Ninth Floor Sherman Oaks, California 91403-3221 10 11 12 2. or disclosed by the Defendant solely for the purposes of preparation for and trial of this action. Under no circumstances shall information or materials covered by this Protective Order be disclosed to anyone other than Plaintiff’s counsel of record in this action, paralegals, secretarial employees under counsel’s direct supervision, and such persons employed to act as experts in this action. At the conclusion of the proceedings in this action, all documents and information subject to this Order, including any copies or extracts or summaries thereof, or documents containing information taken therefrom, shall be returned to counsel for the Defendant. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 3. 25 26 27 28 Prior to disclosure of any documents designated as “confidential” to paralegals or secretarial employees of counsel or Plaintiff, counsel for Plaintiff shall require such employees to read this Protective Order and agree to be bound by its terms. 4. If counsel for Plaintiff determines that for purposes of this action, documents or information produced by the Defendant and designated as “confidential” must be revealed to a person employed to act as an expert in this action, then counsel may reveal the designated documents or information to such person, after first complying with the following: (a) 23 24 Counsel for Plaintiff shall use all documents and information produced Counsel for the Plaintiff shall have the expert read this Order and shall explain the contents thereof to such expert. (b) Counsel for the Plaintiff shall require such expert to sign a copy of this protective order that states: “I have read and understood the terms of this protective order. I further agree to be bound by its terms.” Nothing in this paragraph shall be deemed to enlarge the right of Defendant to conduct discovery of any of - 2 Plaintiff’s experts, except solely with Lotich v. Lowe’s HIW, Inc. Case No.: EDCV13- 536SVW(DTBx) 1 respect to the ability of such expert to protect confidential information 2 and documents from re-disclosure. 3 4 5 6 7 8 5. that contain information that has been designated as "Confidential" or "Attorneys' Eyes Only," shall be accompanied by an application to file the papers or the portion thereof containing the designated information under seal; and the application shall be directed to the judge to whom the papers are directed. For motions, the parties shall file a redacted version of the motion and supporting papers. 9 THARPE & HOWELL, LLP 15250 Ventura Boulevard, Ninth Floor Sherman Oaks, California 91403-3221 10 11 12 6. 15 16 At the conclusion of the proceedings in this action, all documents and information subject to this Order, including any copies or extracts or summaries thereof, or documents containing information taken therefrom, shall be returned to counsel for the Defendant. 13 14 In accordance with Local Rule 79-5.1, any papers filed with the Court 7. This Order is subject to revocation and modification by Order of the Court upon written stipulation of the parties, or upon motion and reasonable notice, including opportunity for hearing and presentation of evidence. Entered this 3rd day of May, 2013. 17 18 ______________________________ David T. Bristow, U.S. Magistrate Judge 19 20 APPROVED FOR ENTRY: 21 23 /s/ __________________________________ Attorney for Plaintiff, David Lotich 24 /s/ 22 25 26 __________________________________ Attorney for Defendant Lowe’s HIW, Inc. 27 28 -3Lotich v. Lowe’s HIW, Inc. Case No.: EDCV13536SVW(DTBx)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?