Sarkis J Khoury v. The Regents of the University of California et al

Filing 173

JUDGMENT ON SPECIAL VERDICT AFTER JURY TRIAL by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED as follows: (See document for specifics) (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (iva)

1
2
3

JS-6

4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – EASTERN DIVISION

9
10
11 SARKIS J. KHOURY,
Case No. EDCV 13-00716 JGB (DTBx)

12
13

Plaintiff,
JUDGMENT ON SPECIAL VERDICT
AFTER JURY TRIAL

v.

14
THE REGENTS OF THE
15 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA,
16

Defendants.

Judge:
Trial Date:

Hon. Jesus G. Bernal
May 12, 2015

17
18 THE REGENTS OF THE
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA,
19
Counter-Claimant,
20
21

v.

22 SARKIS J. KHOURY and ROES 1
through 10, inclusive.
23
Counter-Defendants.
24
25
26
27
28
JUDGMENT ON SPECIAL VERDICT

EDCV 13-00716 JGB (DTBx)

The matter came on regularly for trial before a jury, commencing on May 12,

1

2 2015 in Courtroom One of the United States District Court for the Central District
3 of California, the Honorable Jesus G. Bernal presiding. Plaintiff Sarkis J. Khoury
4 was represented by attorneys Dan Siegel and Sonya Mehta of Siegel & Yee, and
5 Defendant the Regents of the University of California (the “Regents”) was
6 represented by Sandra McDonough, Angela Mullins, and Evan Peña of Paul,
7 Plevin, Sullivan & Connaughton LLP.
A jury of eight persons was impaneled and sworn. Witnesses were sworn

8

9 and testified. After hearing the evidence and arguments of counsel, the jury was
10 duly instructed by the Court, and the claims were submitted to the jury with
11 instructions to return a Special Verdict. The jury deliberated and returned into
12 Court with its Special Verdict on May 22, 2015. These findings are shown by the
13 jury’s response on the Verdict Form, a redacted copy of which appears on the
14 Court’s docket as Document Number 168.
In accordance with the verdict so rendered by the jury in this matter, IT IS

15

16 HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED as follows:
17

(1) As to Plaintiff’s claim for retaliation, judgment is entered in favor of the

18

Regents against Plaintiff Sarkis Khoury. Plaintiff Sarkis Khoury shall

19

recover nothing from Defendant the Regents;
(2) As to the Regents’ counterclaims for negligent misrepresentation and

20
21

unjust enrichment, judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff Sarkis Khoury

22

against the Regents; and

23

(3) As to the Regents’ counterclaim for fraudulent concealment, judgment is

24

entered in favor of the Regents against Plaintiff Sarkis Khoury. Plaintiff

25

Sarkis Khoury is to submit damages to the Regents in the amount of

26

$14,500.00 with interest at the legal rate.

27 / / /
28 / / /
JUDGMENT ON SPECIAL VERDICT

2

EDCV 13-00716 JGB (DTBx)

1

As the prevailing party, Defendant the Regents is entitled to recover costs of

2 suit in an amount to be determined by the Clerk of Court pursuant to Civil Local
3 Rule 54.1 of the Central District of California.
4
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

6
7

Dated: June 17, 2015
Honorable Jesus G. Bernal
United States District Judge

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JUDGMENT ON SPECIAL VERDICT

3

EDCV 13-00716 JGB (DTBx)