Lisa Misraje Bentley v. James Randall Argue et al
Filing
14
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE. LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. The Court therefore ORDERS Plaintiff TO SHOW CAUSE by Thursday, October 10, 2013, why the Court should not dismiss her case for lack of prosecution. No hearing will be held. The Court will discharge this Order upon a written statement demonstrating good cause or valid proofs of service for each Defendant. Failure to timely respond will result in dismissal of this action. (lc). Modified on 10/3/2013 (lc).
O
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
LISA MISRAJE BENTLEY,
13
14
15
16
17
18
v.
Plaintiff,
Case No. 5:13-cv-00950-ODW(OPx)
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE.
LACK OF PROSECUTION
JAMES RANDALL ARGUE; DAVID
BRADSHAW; RALPH LINHARDT;
MICHAEL H. RAMSEY; JACK ONG;
JOHN DAVID WARE; DOES 1–10,
inclusive,
Defendants.
19
On May 23, 2013, Plaintiff Lisa Misraje Bentley filed a Complaint against
20
Defendants. The Clerk of Court issued a Summons the same day. Federal Rule of
21
Civil Procedure 4(m) provides that the court “must” dismiss an action if a defendant
22
has not been served within 120 days after the plaintiff files her complaint, unless the
23
plaintiff can show good cause for the delay.
24
Defendants by September 20, 2013—120 days after May 23, 2013. To date, Plaintiff
25
has not filed a single proof of service.
Plaintiff therefore had to serve
26
The Court therefore ORDERS Plaintiff TO SHOW CAUSE by Thursday,
27
October 10, 2013, why the Court should not dismiss her case for lack of prosecution.
28
No hearing will be held. The Court will discharge this Order upon a written statement
1
demonstrating good cause or valid proofs of service for each Defendant. Failure to
2
timely respond will result in dismissal of this action.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
October 3, 2013
6
7
8
____________________________________
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?