Jamie Giles v. Vitas Healthcare Corporation of California et al

Filing 20

PROTECTIVE ORDER RE CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION AND DOCUMENTS by Magistrate Judge David T. Bristow Re Stipulation for Protective Order 18 . IT IS SO ORDERED. (ad)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 REED E. SCHAPER, Bar No. 082792 rschaper@hkemploymentlaw.com ROBERT R. FLEMER, Bar No. 228946 rflemer@hkemploymentlaw.com HIRSCHFELD KRAEMER LLP 233 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 600 Santa Monica, CA 90401 Telephone: (310) 255-0705 Facsimile: (310) 255-0986 Attorneys for Defendants VITAS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION OF CALIFORNIA and VITAS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 CENTRAL DISTRICT 12 SANTA MONICA ATTORNEYS AT LAW H IRSCHFELD K RAEMER LLP 11 JAMIE GILES, an individual, 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff, vs. VITAS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION OF CALIFORNIA, a California corporation; VITAS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation; and DOES 1-25, inclusive, Defendants. Case No. EDCV 13-982 GW (DTBx) [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER RE: CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION AND DOCUMENTS Judge: Ctrm: Hon. George H. Wu 10 (Los Angeles) Judge: Ctrm: David T. Bristow 4 (Riverside) 1 2 3 4 Having considered the Parties’ Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Protective Order Re: Confidential Information and Documents in this matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Parties’ Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Protective Order Re: Confidential Information and Documents be entered. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 9 DATED: November 6, 2013 ___________________________________ Honorable David T. Bristow 10 12 SANTA MONICA ATTORNEYS AT LAW H IRSCHFELD K RAEMER LLP 11 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?