Jamie Giles v. Vitas Healthcare Corporation of California et al
Filing
20
PROTECTIVE ORDER RE CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION AND DOCUMENTS by Magistrate Judge David T. Bristow Re Stipulation for Protective Order 18 . IT IS SO ORDERED. (ad)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
REED E. SCHAPER, Bar No. 082792
rschaper@hkemploymentlaw.com
ROBERT R. FLEMER, Bar No. 228946
rflemer@hkemploymentlaw.com
HIRSCHFELD KRAEMER LLP
233 Wilshire Boulevard
Suite 600
Santa Monica, CA 90401
Telephone: (310) 255-0705
Facsimile: (310) 255-0986
Attorneys for Defendants
VITAS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION
OF CALIFORNIA and VITAS
HEALTHCARE CORPORATION
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
CENTRAL DISTRICT
12
SANTA MONICA
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
H IRSCHFELD K RAEMER LLP
11
JAMIE GILES, an individual,
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Plaintiff,
vs.
VITAS HEALTHCARE
CORPORATION OF
CALIFORNIA, a California
corporation; VITAS HEALTHCARE
CORPORATION, a Delaware
corporation; and DOES 1-25,
inclusive,
Defendants.
Case No. EDCV 13-982 GW (DTBx)
[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE
ORDER RE: CONFIDENTIAL
INFORMATION AND DOCUMENTS
Judge:
Ctrm:
Hon. George H. Wu
10 (Los Angeles)
Judge:
Ctrm:
David T. Bristow
4 (Riverside)
1
2
3
4
Having considered the Parties’ Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Protective
Order Re: Confidential Information and Documents in this matter,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Parties’ Joint Stipulation and [Proposed]
Protective Order Re: Confidential Information and Documents be entered.
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
9
DATED: November 6, 2013
___________________________________
Honorable David T. Bristow
10
12
SANTA MONICA
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
H IRSCHFELD K RAEMER LLP
11
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?