Betsworth v. San Bernardino County et al

Filing 56

PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym [NOTE CHANGES MADE BY COURT] (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS). (kca)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EASTERN DIVISION, RIVERSIDE 11 12 13 TRIXY M. BETSWORTH, an individual, and JACQUELYN 14 FITHIAN, an individual 15 Plaintiffs, 16 17 Case No. 5:13-CV-1058-JGB (SPx) Hon. Jesus G. Bernal PROTECTIVE ORDER [NOTE CHANGES MADE BY COURT] v. 18 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY; 19 ARROWHEAD REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER; and DOES 1-10, 20 inclusive. 21 Defendants. 22 23 Action Filed: June 12, 2013 Trial Date: March 24, 2015 24 25 26 27 28 5:13-CV-1058-JGB (SPx) Protective Order ORDER 1 2 Good cause appearing for the issuance of a protective order, IT IS HEREBY 3 ORDERED that the Stipulated Protective Order shall be, and is hereby, entered, 4 with the following changes: 5 1. On page 5, the words “or trial” are stricken from the first line of paragraph 6 V.B.2, as this Order does not govern the use or treatment of Confidential 7 Information at trial; and 8 2. The last full sentence on page 6, in the third paragraph of section VII.A, is 9 modified to read: “Documents containing Confidential Information that 10 are filed with the Court must be filed with an application to seal the 11 documents in compliance with Local Rule 79-5.” 12 13 14 Dated: _November 19, 2014_____ Hon. Sheri Pym 15 16 17 2338572.1 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Protective Order 5:13-CV-1058-JGB (SPx)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?