Elizabeth C. Stewart v. Stanley L. Sniff
Filing
30
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 29 . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the motion, the other records on file herein, and the Report and R ecommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the time for filing objections has expired and no objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge and adopts them as its own findings and conclusions. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants' motion to dismiss is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff is to file a Second Amended Complaint as to her surviving claims within thirty days of this order. (jy)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
ELIZABETH C. STEWART,
Plaintiff,
11
12
13
v.
STANLEY L. SNIFF, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
16
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. CV 13-1153(PJW)
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND
ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS,
AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED
STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the motion,
17
the other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation
18
of the United States Magistrate Judge.
19
objections has expired and no objections have been made.
20
accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge and
21
adopts them as its own findings and conclusions.
22
Further, the time for filing
The Court
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants’ motion to dismiss is
23
granted in part and denied in part.
24
Amended Complaint as to her surviving claims within thirty days of
25
this order.
26
Plaintiff is to file a Second
DATED: August 5, 2014
27
BEVERLY REID O’CONNELL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
28
C:\Temp\notesD30550\Order accepting RR.wpd
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?