Tony Chandel Graham Sr v. James E Henning et al
Filing
36
ORDER (1) ACCEPTING THE FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 32 , AND (2) DISMISSING THE COMPLAINT by Judge Jesus G. Bernal: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint and all other papers along with the attached Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and has made a de novo determination of the Report and Recommendation. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that a Judgment be entered (1) approving the findings of the United States Magistrate Judge, and (2) directing that Judgment be entered dismissing the Complaint, and the action, without prejudice. (ad)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
WESTERN DIVISION
7
8
9
10
11
TONY CHANDEL GRAHAM, SR.,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
JAMES E. HENNING, et al.,
15
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. ED CV 13-01200-JGB (VBK)
ORDER (1) ACCEPTING THE FINDINGS
AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED
STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND (2)
DISMISSING THE COMPLAINT
16
17
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint
18
and all other papers along with the attached Report and Recommendation
19
of the United States Magistrate Judge, and has made a de novo
20
determination of the Report and Recommendation.
21
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that a Judgment be entered (1) approving
22
the findings of the United States Magistrate Judge, and (2) directing
23
that Judgment be entered dismissing the Complaint, and the action,
24
without prejudice.
25
26
27
28
DATED:
March 27, 2014
JESUS G. BERNAL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?