Tony Chandel Graham Sr v. James E Henning et al

Filing 36

ORDER (1) ACCEPTING THE FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 32 , AND (2) DISMISSING THE COMPLAINT by Judge Jesus G. Bernal: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint and all other papers along with the attached Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and has made a de novo determination of the Report and Recommendation. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that a Judgment be entered (1) approving the findings of the United States Magistrate Judge, and (2) directing that Judgment be entered dismissing the Complaint, and the action, without prejudice. (ad)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION 7 8 9 10 11 TONY CHANDEL GRAHAM, SR., 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. JAMES E. HENNING, et al., 15 Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. ED CV 13-01200-JGB (VBK) ORDER (1) ACCEPTING THE FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND (2) DISMISSING THE COMPLAINT 16 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint 18 and all other papers along with the attached Report and Recommendation 19 of the United States Magistrate Judge, and has made a de novo 20 determination of the Report and Recommendation. 21 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that a Judgment be entered (1) approving 22 the findings of the United States Magistrate Judge, and (2) directing 23 that Judgment be entered dismissing the Complaint, and the action, 24 without prejudice. 25 26 27 28 DATED: March 27, 2014 JESUS G. BERNAL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?