Juan Pablo Martinez v. Fulton Friedman & Gullace LLP et al

Filing 10

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANTS by Judge Virginia A. Phillips, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 9 . IT IS SO ORDERED that all claims of Plaintiff JUAN PABLO MARTINEZ, against Defendants, FULTON, FRIEDMAN & GULLACE, LLP; and DOES 1 to 10, inclusive are dismissed, with prejudice. Plaintiff JUAN PABLO MARTINEZ, and Defendant FULTON, FRIEDMAN & GULLACE, LLP, shall each bear their own costs and attorneys fees. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (mrgo)

1
2
3
4
5

G. Thomas Martin, III, Esq. (SBN 218456)
PRICE LAW GROUP, APC
15760 Ventura Blvd., Suite 1100
Encino, CA 91436
T: [phone]; F: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
JUAN PABLO MARTINEZ

JS-6

6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, EASTERN DIVISION

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
vs.
)
)
FULTON, FRIEDMAN & GULLACE, )
LLP; and DOES 1 to 10, inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
JUAN PABLO MARTINEZ,

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE BETWEEN
PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANTS

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that all claims of

17
18

Case No.: EDCV13-1212-VAP(OPx)

Plaintiff JUAN PABLO MARTINEZ, against Defendants, FULTON,
FRIEDMAN & GULLACE, LLP; and DOES 1 to 10, inclusive are dismissed, with
prejudice. Plaintiff JUAN PABLO MARTINEZ, and Defendant FULTON,
FRIEDMAN & GULLACE, LLP, shall each bear their own costs and attorneys’
fees.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED:October 29, 2013___

___________________________________
Virginia A. Phillips, District Court Judge
Central District of California

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order of Dismissal
-1-