Dennis Rutherford v. Palo Verde Health Care District et al
Filing
587
AMENDED JUDGMENT 526 by Judge John A. Kronstadt. See judgment for specifics. (ah)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – RIVERSIDE
10
11
12
DENNIS RUTHERFORD, an
individual; PETER KLUNE, an
individual, and TARA BARTH, an
individual,
13
14
Plaintiffs,
Case No. EDCV13-01247 JAK (SPx)
[Consolidated with Case Nos.
EDCV13-01249 JAK (SPx) and
EDCV13-01250 JAK (SPx)]
AMENDED JUDGMENT
vs.
15
16
17
18
19
PALO VERDE HEALTH CARE
DISTRICT, a public entity; TRINA
SARTIN, an individual; SANDRA
HUDSON, an individual; and DOES
1-50, inclusive,
Defendants.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
1
Pursuant to Rules 54(a) and 58(b)(2)(B) of the Federal Rules of Civil
2
Procedure, following the pretrial and court trial proceedings in this matter, and to
3
proceed as to matters in aid of the pending appeals by providing a single judgment
4
that addresses all matters that have been adjudicated,
5
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT:
6
As to the second claim for relief by Plaintiff Peter Klune (“Klune”) for breach
7
of contract, JUDGMENT is entered in favor of Klune and against Defendant Palo
8
Verde Health Care District in the amount of $440,648, plus prejudgment interest in
9
the amount of $124,104.16. As to all other claims for relief brought by Klune, he
10
shall take nothing, and judgment is entered in favor of Defendants Palo Verde
11
Healthcare District, Trina Sartin, Sandra Hudson and Samuel Burton.
12
As to all claims by Plaintiffs Dennis Rutherford (“Rutherford”) and Tara Barth
13
(“Barth”), each shall take nothing and judgment is entered in favor of Defendants
14
Palo Verde Healthcare District, Trina Sartin, Sandra Hudson and Samuel Burton.
15
The Court having previously awarded interim attorney’s fees to Defendants
16
pursuant to the California anti-SLAPP statute, it is further ordered that Defendant
17
Palo Verde Health Care District is entitled to recover $10,990.31 in attorney’s fees
18
from Klune, $10,055.16 in attorney’s fees from Rutherford, and $8594.53 in
19
attorney’s fees from Barth. Defendants are also awarded interest on each of these
20
amounts at the legal rate commencing June 12, 2014, which is the date of each award.
21
That interest will continue to accrue as to each award until it is satisfied. Each
22
plaintiff is liable only for the amount of the award against him or her together with the
23
associated interest on such award.
24
The Court having decided the motions of Klune and Defendants for attorney’s
25
fees following entry of Judgment on November 16, 2015 (Dkt. 576), it is further
26
ordered that Klune is entitled to recover $31,025 in fees against Defendant Palo Verde
27
Health Care District under Cal. Civ. Code Cal. § 1717, Palo Verde Health Care
28
District is entitled to recover $19,981 in fees against Rutherford and Barth pursuant to
2
1
Cal. Civ. Code Cal. § 1717, and Defendants are entitled to recover $3750 in fees
2
against Barth, Rutherford and Klune pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988. Defendants are
3
the prevailing party for the purpose of recovery of allowed costs as set forth in Local
4
Civil Rule 54 as to Plaintiffs Rutherford and Barth. The Court, having decided
5
Rutherford and Barth’s motion to retax costs awarded by the Clerk following entry of
6
Judgment, it is ordered that Rutherford and Barth are jointly and severally liable for
7
$48,243.65 in costs and that Rutherford is solely liable for $3450.22 in costs.
8
9
10
As to Defendants and Klune, because neither is the prevailing party, each shall
be responsible for the costs each incurred.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
12
Dated: November 28, 2016
By:
Hon. John A. Kronstadt
United States District Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?