Michael Taylor et al v. City of Colton et al

Filing 37

ORDER For Dismissal with Prejudice of Entire Case by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 36 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Court hereby dismisses with prejudice all claims against all defendants to this action. 2. The Co urt hereby dismisses with prejudice the above entitled action in its entirety. 3. Any and all pending dates on calendar for this matter including the final pre-trial conference date set for September 15, 2014, and the trial date set for September 30, 2014 are hereby VACATED. See document for details. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (smo)

1
E-FILED-9/12/14
JS-6

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

MICHAEL TAYLOR, as an individual Case No.: 5:13-CV-01330 PSG-AJW
[Hon. Philip S. Gutierrez, District Judge; Hon.
and as successor in interest to Trevor
Taylor; MINDI HILBORN, an individual Andrew J. Wistrich, Magistrate Judge]
and as successor in interest to Trevor
Taylor,
[PROPOSED] ORDER FOR
Plaintiffs,
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF
vs.
ENTIRE ACTION
CITY OF COLTON, a municipal entity;
TODD SMITH, an individual, LOU
GAMACHE, an individual, STEVE
DAVIS, an individual, CHUCK
DEDIANOUS, an individual, JOE
GONZALES, an individual, RAY
MENDEZ, an individual, JACK
MORENBERG, an individual, STEVE
WARD, an individual, and DOES 1-10,
inclusive,

Complaint Filed:
Pre-Trial Conf.:
Trial Date:

May 22, 2013
September 15, 2014
September 30, 2014

Defendants.

24
25
26

PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, and pursuant to the

27

Court’s inherent and statutory authority, including but not limited to the Court’s

28

authority under the applicable Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, including but not

[PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF ENTIRE ACTION
-1-

1

limited to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), and the United States

2

District Court, Central District of California Local Rules; after due consideration of all

3

of the relevant pleadings, papers, and records in this action; and upon such other

4

evidence or argument as was presented to the Court; Good Cause appearing therefor,

5

and in furtherance of the interests of justice,

6

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

7

1.

8
9
10
11

The Court hereby dismisses with prejudice all claims against all

defendants to this action.
2.

The Court hereby dismisses with prejudice the above entitled action in

its entirety.
3.

Any and all pending dates on calendar for this matter – including the final

12

pre-trial conference date (“PTC”) set for September 15, 2014, and the trial date set for

13

September 30, 2014 – are hereby VACATED.

14

4.

Nothing in this Order shall be construed as affecting, modifying, or

15

vacating the Court’s Protective Order re Confidential Documents [Dkt. Doc. 16], and

16

the Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce such Protective Order as may be

17

warranted.

18

5.

Nothing in this Order shall be construed as affecting, modifying, or

19

rescinding any dismissals previously granted or Ordered in this action [see, e.g., Dkt.

20

Doc. 26, 30].

21
22
23

IT IS SO ORDERED.
9/12/14
Dated: _______________

___________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

24
25
26
27
28

[PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF ENTIRE ACTION
-2-

1
2

Respectfully Submitted By:

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

Mildred K. O’Linn, Esq. (State Bar No. 159055)
Tony M. Sain, Esq. (State Bar No. 251626)
MANNING & KASS
ELLROD, RAMIREZ, TRESTER LLP
801 South Figueroa Street
15th Floor at 801 Tower
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]; [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants,
CITY OF COLTON, TODD SMITH, LOU
GAMACHE, STEVE DAVIS, CHUCK
DEDIANOUS, JOE GUTIERREZ (erroneously
sued as JOE GONZALES), RAY MENDEZ,
JACK MORENBERG, and STEVE WARD

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

[PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF ENTIRE ACTION
-3-