Kathryn Holeman v. Carolyn W Colvin

Filing 31

ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, PURSUANT TO28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), AND COSTS, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920 25 by Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall be awarded atto rney fees under the EAJA in the amount of FOUR THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED EIGHTEEN dollars and 63/CENTS ($4,918.63), and costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920, in the amount of FOUR HUNDRED dollars and 00/CENTS ($400.00), subject to the terms of the above-referenced Stipulation. Any payment shall be delivered to Plaintiff's counsel. (es)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Manuel D. Serpa, Calif. Bar No. 174182 LAW OFFICES OF HARRY J. BINDER AND CHARLES E. BINDER, P.C. 770 The City Drive South Suite 2000 Orange, CA 92868 Phone (714) 564-8644 Fax (714) 940-0311 Email: manuel.serpa@binderlawfirm.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Kathryn Holeman obo Jason Boyle 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 KATHRYN HOLEMAN OBO JASON BOYLE, Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. EDCV 13-2169 FFM AMENDED PROPOSED ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), AND COSTS, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920 Defendant. Based upon the parties’ Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) Fees and Costs, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney fees under the EAJA in the amount of FOUR THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED EIGHTEEN dollars and 63/CENTS ($4,918.63), and costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920, in the amount of FOUR HUNDRED dollars and 00/CENTS ($400.00), subject to the terms of the above-referenced Stipulation. Any payment shall be delivered to Plaintiff’s counsel. 25 26 Dated: July 22, 2015 27 28 /S/ FREDERICK F. MUMM FREDERICK F. MUMM UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?