Michael Guy Davison v. Carolyn W. Colvin
Filing
25
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Ralph Zarefsky. (ib)
O
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MICHAEL GUY DAVISON,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
vs.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
15
Defendant.
16
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. ED CV 13-02175 RZ
MEMORANDUM OPINION
AND ORDER
17
While lifting a heavy tub of oil during the graveyard shift at a Taco Bell,
18
Plaintiff strained his back and developed an inguinal hernia. The hernia was surgically
19
repaired. Plaintiff claims that the back sprain disables him. The Administrative Law Judge
20
found otherwise, and Plaintiff asserts that the Administrative Law Judge was wrong
21
because he did not accept the opinion of Plaintiff’s treating physician. The Court agrees
22
with the Commissioner.
23
It is of course true that the Commissioner owes deference to the opinions of
24
a treating physician, Auckland v. Massanari, 257 F.3d 1033, 1036 (9th Cir. 2001), and also
25
true here that the Administrative Law Judge was wrong in stating that the treating
26
physician was not a specialist and that his opinion was inconsistent with Plaintiff’s
27
activities of daily living, which were only sedentary activities. [AR 20-21] However, the
28
Administrative Law Judge was within his discretion in concluding that the opinion was not
1
supported by the findings of the treating physician himself, especially given that the
2
treating physician’s opinion was an initial opinion not long after the incident, and included
3
a treatment plan of physical therapy and continued work at a modified level. [AR 418-19]
4
Plaintiff recovered from his hernia, and substantial evidence elsewhere in the record clearly
5
supported the conclusion that Plaintiff could work [AR 20], performing other work in the
6
economy.
7
The decision of the Commissioner is affirmed.
8
9
DATED: September 16, 2014
10
11
RALPH ZAREFSKY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?