David Lee Pace v. FFE et al

Filing 13

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Gary A. Feess: The Court is in receipt of Defendant FFE Transportation Services, Inc.'s motion to dismiss and motion to transfer [6, 7]. However, on January 8, 2014, the Court issued an order to show cause regar ding why the case should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction 8 . The order to show cause allowed Defendant the opportunity to file a responsive pleading by Friday, February 7, 2014. In order for the Court to have the opportunity to review and consider the contents of Defendant's response to the order to show cause, the motion hearing presently scheduled for Monday, February 10, 2014, at 9:30 a.m. is hereby CONTINUED to Monday, February 24, 2014, at 9:30 a.m. (smo)

LINKS: 6, 7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No.

ED CV 13-2304 GAF (SPx)

Title

David Lee Pace v. FFE et al

Present: The Honorable

Date

February 3, 2014

GARY ALLEN FEESS

Stephen Montes Kerr
Deputy Clerk

None
Court Reporter / Recorder

N/A
Tape No.

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:

Attorneys Present for Defendants:

None

None

Proceedings:

(In Chambers)
ORDER CONTINUING HEARING

The Court is in receipt of Defendant FFE Transportation Services, Inc.’s (“Defendant”)
motion to dismiss and motion to transfer. (Docket Nos. 6 and 7.) However, on January 8, 2014,
the Court issued an order to show cause regarding why the case should not be dismissed for lack
of subject matter jurisdiction. (Docket No. 8 [Order to Show Cause].) The order to show cause
allowed Defendant the opportunity to file a responsive pleading by Friday, February 7, 2014.
(Id.) In order for the Court to have the opportunity to review and consider the contents of
Defendant’s response to the order to show cause, the motion hearing presently scheduled for
Monday, February 10, 2014, at 9:30 a.m. is hereby CONTINUED to Monday, February 24,
2014, at 9:30 a.m.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

CV-90 (06/04)

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Page 1 of 1