Neptune Trading Inc et al v. Master Cutlery Inc

Filing 30

PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (sp)

Download PDF
Case 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 349-PSG-E Document 29-1 Filed 09/16/14 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:465 BENJAMIN ASHUROV SBN 271716 Bashurov@KB-Ash.com KB ASH Law Group PC 7011 Koll Center Pkwy, Suite 160 Pleasanton, CA 94566 Telephone: 415.754.9346 Facsimile: 415.952.9325 A ttorneys for Plaint ffs/Counter-Defendants NEPTUNE TRADING, INC. and WUU JAU CO., INC. 7 8 9 10 I- UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 1213 < NEPTUNE-TRADING, INC., and WUU JAU CO., INC. Plaintiffs, 14 16 z V. MASTER CUTLERY, INC. - [1IE0I PROTECTIVE ORDER Judge: Hon. Philip S. Gutierrez Magistrate: Charles F. Eick 15 w CASE NO. 5:13-CV-02349-PSG-(Ex) Trial Date: May 5, 2015 - 18 ’,: .- 19 Defendant. MASTER CUTLERY, INC. 20 Counterclaimant, 21 22 V. 23 24 NEPTUNE TRADING, INC. and WUU JAU CO., INC. 25 Counter-Defendants. 26 27 28 1. PURPOSE AND LIMITS OF THIS ORDER [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER CASE No. 5:13-CV-02349-PSG-(Ex) Case 5 1 2349-PSG-E Document 29-1 Filed 09/16/14 Page 2 of 11 Page ID #:466 Discovery in this action is likely to involve confidential, proprietary, or 2 private information requiring special protection from public disclosure and from 3 use for any purpose other than this litigation. Thus, the Court enters this Protective 4 Order. This Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or 5 responses to discovery, and the protection it gives from public disclosure and use 6 extends only to the specific material entitled to confidential treatment under the 7 applicable legal principles. This Order does not automatically authorize the filing 8 0 9 U 10 ii 12 13 14 15 16 under seal of material designated under this Order. Instead, the parties must comply with Local Rule 79-5.1. This Order does not govern the use at trial of material designated under this Order. 2. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 2.1 Over-Designation Prohibited. Any party or non-party who designates information or items for protection under this Order as "CONFIDENTIAL," "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEY EYES ONLY," or "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - SOURCE CODE" (a "designator") must only designate specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards. To the extent practicable, only those parts of documents, items, or oral or written Z communications that require protection shall be designated. Designations with a - 18 - higher confidentiality level when a lower level would suffice are prohibited. Mass, 19 indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. Unjustified designations 20 expose the designator to sanctions, including the Court’s striking all confidentiality 21 designations made by that designator. Designation under this Order is allowed only 22 if the designation is necessary to protect material that, if disclosed to persons not 23 authorized to view it, would cause competitive or other recognized harm. Material 24 may not be designated if it has been made public, or if designation is otherwise 25 unnecessary to protect a secrecy interest. If a designator learns that information or 26 items that it designated for protection do not qualify for protection at all or do not 27 qualify for the level of protection initially asserted, that designator must promptly 28 notify all parties that it is withdrawing the mistaken designation. -2- [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER CASE No. 5:13-CV-02349-PSG-(Ex) Case - I cv- 02349-PSG-E Document 29-1 Filed 09/16/14 Page 3 of 11 Page ID #:467 2.2 Manner and Timing of Designations. Designation under this Order 2 requires the designator to affix the applicable legend ("CONFIDENTIAL," 3 "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEY EYES ONLY," or "HIGHLY 4 CONFIDENTIAL - SOURCE CODE") to each page that contains protected 5 material. For testimony given in deposition or other proceeding, the designator 6 shall specify all protected testimony and the level of protection being asserted. It 7 may make that designation during the deposition or proceeding, or may invoke, on 8 the record or by written notice to all parties on or before the next business day, a 9 right to have up to 21 days from the deposition or proceeding to make its designation. 10 I- 11 ’0 12 13 2.2.1 A party or non-party that makes original documents or materials available for inspection need not designate them for protection until after the inspecting party has identified which material it would like copied and produced. During the inspection and before the designation, all material shall be treated as 14 15 16 Z - (I) - 17 18 O HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEY EYES ONLY. After the inspecting party has identified the documents it wants copied and produced, the producing party must designate the documents, or portions thereof, that qualify for protection under this Order. 2.2.2 Parties shall give advance notice if they expect a deposition or other 19 proceeding to include designated material so that the other parties can ensure that 20 only authorized individuals are present at those proceedings when such material is 21 disclosed or used. The use of a document as an exhibit at a deposition shall not in 22 any way affect its designation. Transcripts containing designated material shall 23 have a legend on the title page noting the presence of designated material, and the 24 title page shall be followed by a list of all pages (including line numbers as 25 appropriate) that have been designated, and the level of protection being asserted. 26 The designator shall inform the court reporter of these requirements. Any 27 transcript that is prepared before the expiration of the 21-day period for designation 28 shall be treated during that period as if it had been designated HIGHLY 0. -3- [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER CASE No. 5:13-CV-02349-PSG-(Ex) Case 5 -cv-02349-PSG-E Document 29-1 Filed 09/16/14 Page 4 of 11 Page ID #:468 1 CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEY EYES ONLY unless otherwise agreed. After 2 the expiration of the 21-day period, the transcript shall be treated only as actually 3 4 II designated. 2.3 Inadvertent Failures to Designate. An inadvertent failure to designate 5 does not, standing alone, waive protection under this Order. Upon timely assertion 6 or correction of a designation, all recipients must make reasonable efforts to ensure 7 that the material is treated according to this Order. 8 9 U 10 F- 11 0, 0, 12 13 14 15 16 OF- - z : - 17 3. CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS All challenges to confidentiality designations shall proceed under Local Rule 37-1 through Local Rule 37-4. 4. ACCESS TO DESIGNATED MATERIAL 4.1 Basic Principles. A receiving party may use designated material only for this litigation. Designated material may be disclosed only to the categories of persons and under the conditions described in this Order. 4.2 Disclosure of CONFIDENTIAL Material Without Further Approval. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court or permitted in writing by the designator, a receiving party may disclose any material designated CONFIDENTIAL only to: 4.2.1 The receiving party’s outside counsel of record in this action and 18 employees of outside counsel of record to whom disclosure is reasonably 19 rA o, necessary; 0. 20 4.2.2 The officers, directors, and employees of the receiving party to whom 21 disclosure is reasonably necessary, and who have signed the Agreement to Be 22 Bound (Exhibit A); 23 4.2.3 Experts retained by the receiving party’s outside counsel of record to 24 whom disclosure is reasonably necessary, and who have signed the Agreement to 25 Be Bound (Exhibit A); 26 4.2.4 The Court and its personnel; 27 4.2.5 Outside court reporters and their staff, professional jury or trial 28 consultants, and professional vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary, -4- [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER CASE No. 5:13-CV-02349-PSG-(Ex) Case 5 02349-PSG-E Document 29-1 Filed 09/16/14 Page 5 of 11 Page ID #:469 and who have signed the Agreement to Be Bound (Exhibit A); 2 4.2.6 During their depositions, witnesses in the action to whom disclosure is 3 reasonably necessary and who have signed the Agreement to Be Bound (Exhibit 4 A); and 5 6 7 8 9 U 10 I- 11 custodian or other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information. 4.3 Disclosure of HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEY EYES ONLY and HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - SOURCE CODE Material Without Further Approval. Unless permitted in writing by the designator, a receiving party may disclose material designated HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEY EYES ONLY or HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - SOURCE CODE without further approval only to: C,, ’0 4.2.7 The author or recipient of a document containing the material, or a 11 4.3:1 The receiving party’s outside counsel of record in this action and 13 14 15 16 z employees of outside counsel of record to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information; 4.3.2 The Court and its personnel; 4.3.3 Outside court reporters and their staff, professional jury or trial 17 consultants, and professional vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary, 18 and who have signed the Agreement to Be Bound (Exhibit A); and : 11) 0 19 0. 20 21 4.3.4 The author or recipient of a document containing the material, or a custodian or other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information. 4.4 Procedures for Approving or Objecting to Disclosure of HIGHLY 22 CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEY EYES ONLY or HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - 23 SOURCE CODE Material to In-House Counsel or Experts. Unless agreed to in 24 writing by the designator: 25 4.4.1 A party seeking to disclose to in-house counsel any material 26 designated HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEY EYES ONLY must first 27 make a written request to the designator providing the full name of the in-house 28 counsel, the city and state of such counsel’s residence, and such counsel’s current -5- [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER CASE No. 5:13-CV-02349-PSG-(Ex) Case E 349 - PSG-E Document 29 - 1 Filed 09/16/14 Page 6 of 11 Page ID #:470 1 and reasonably foreseeable future primary job duties and responsibilities in 2 sufficient detail to determine present or potential involvement in any competitive 3 decision-making. In-house counsels are not authorized to receive material 4 designated HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - SOURCE CODE. 5 4.4.2 A party seeking to disclose to an expert retained by outside counsel of 6 record any information or item that has been designated HIGHLY 7 CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEY EYES ONLY or HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - 8 SOURCE CODE must first make a written request to the designator that (1) 9 L) 10 F- 11 0, -12 13 14 15 16 QF- z Fl) 17 identifies the general categories of HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEY EYES ONLY or HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - SOURCE CODE information that the receiving party seeks permission to disclose to the expert, (2) sets forth the full name of the expert and the city and state of his or her primary residence, (3) attaches a copy of the expert’s current resume, (4) identifies the expert’s current employer(s), (5) identifies each person or entity from whom the expert has received compensation or funding for work in his or her areas of expertise (including in connection with litigation) in the past five years, and (6) identifies (by name and number of the case, filing date, and location of court) any litigation where the expert has offered expert testimony, including by declaration, report, or testimony 18 at deposition or trial, in the past five years. If the expert believes any of this 19 0 information at (4) - (6) is subject to a confidentiality obligation to a third party, 20 then the expert should provide whatever information the expert believes can be 21 disclosed without violating any confidentiality agreements, and the party seeking to 22 disclose the information to the expert shall be available to meet and confer with the 23 designator regarding any such confidentiality obligations. 0. 24 4.4.3 A party that makes a request and provides the information specified in 25 paragraphs 4.4.1 or 4.4.2 may disclose the designated material to the identified in- 26 house counsel or expert unless, within seven days of delivering the request, the 27 party receives a written objection from the designator providing detailed grounds 28 for the objection. -6- [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER CASE No. 5:13-CV-02349-PSG-(EX) Case 5 1 2 02349-PSG-E Document 29-1 Filed 09/16/14 Page 7 of 11 Page ID #:471 4.4.4 All challenges to objections from the designator shall proceed under Local Rule 37-1 through Local Rule 37-4. 3 5. 4 5.1 Designation of Source Code. If production of source code is SOURCE CODE 5 necessary, a party may designate it as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - SOURCE 6 CODE if it is, or includes, confidential, proprietary, or trade secret source code. 7 8 0 9 10 0 I-. 11 > ’o 12 13 14 15 16 Z 17 - () 0 5.2 Location and Supervision of Inspection. Any HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - SOURCE CODE produced in discovery shall be made available for inspection, in a format allowing it to be reasonably reviewed and searched, during normal business hours or at other mutually agreeable times, at an office of the designating party’s counsel or another mutually agreeable location. The source code shall be made available for inspection onasecured computer in a secured room, and the inspecting party shall not copy, remove, or otherwise transfer any portion of the source code onto any recordable media or recordable device. The designator may visually monitor the activities of the inspecting party’s representatives during any source code review, but only to ensure that there is no unauthorized recording, copying, or transmission of the source code. 5.3 Paper Copies of Source Code Excerpts. The inspecting party may 18 request paper copies of limited portions of source code that are reasonably 19 necessary for the preparation of court filings, pleadings, expert reports, other 20 papers, or for deposition or trial. The designator shall provide all such source code 21 in paper form, including Bates numbers and the label "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL 22 SOURCE CODE." 23 5.4 Access Record. The inspecting party shall maintain a record of any 24 individual who has inspected any portion of the source code in electronic or paper 25 form, and shall maintain all paper copies of any printed portions of the source code 26 in a secured, locked area. The inspecting party shall not convert any of the 271 information contained in the paper copies into any electronic format other than for 28 -7- [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER CASE No. 5:13-CV-02349-PSG-(Ex) Case 5 3-cv-02349-PSG-E Document 29-1 Filed 09/16/14 Page 8 of 11 Page ID #:472 the preparation of a pleading, exhibit, expert report, discovery document, 2 deposition transcript, or other Court document. Any paper copies used during a 3 deposition shall be retrieved at the end of each day and must not be left with a court 4 5 I reporter or any other unauthorized individual. 6. ORDERED PRODUCED IN OTHER LITIGATION 6 7 8 ’0 9 ’0 10 I- 11 >’ ’0 1213 14 15 16 Z 17 : Cl) O 18 PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR 6.1 Subpoenas and Court Orders. This Order in no way excuses noncompliance with a lawful subpoena or court order. The purpose of the duties described in this section is to alert the interested parties to the existence of this Order and to give the designator an opportunity to protect its confidentiality interests in the court where the subpoena or order issued. 6.2 Notification Requirement. If a party is served with a subpoena or a court order issued in other litigation that compels disclosure of any information or items received by that party in this action and designated in this action as CONFIDENTIAL, HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEY EYES ONLY, or HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - SOURCE CODE, that party must do the following. 6.2.1 Promptly notify the designator in writing. Such notification shall include a copy of the subpoena or court order. 6.2.2 Promptly notify in writing the party who caused the subpoena or order 19 to issue in the other litigation that some or all of the material covered by the 20 subpoena or order is subject to this Order. Such notification shall include a copy of 21 this Order. 22 23 6.2.3 Cooperate with all reasonable procedures sought by the designator whose material may be affected. 24 6.3 Wait For Resolution of Protective Order. If the designator promptly 25 seeks a protective order, the party served with the subpoena or court order shall not 26 produce any information designated in this action as CONFIDENTIAL, HIGHLY 27 CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEY EYES ONLY or HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - 28 SOURCE CODE before a determination by the court where the subpoena or order -8- [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER CASE No. 5:13-CV-02349-PSG-(Ex) Case -02349-PSG-E Document 29-1 Filed 09/16/14 Page 9 of 11 Page ID #:473 1 issued, unless the party has obtained the designator’s permission. The designator 2 shall bear the burden and expense of seeking protection of its confidential material in that court. 3 4 7. MATERIAL 5 6 UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF DESIGNATED If a receiving party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed 7 designated material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this 8 Order, it must immediately (1) notify in writing the designator of the unauthorized 9 10 w 11 CO 12 13 disclosures, (2) use its best efforts to retrieve all unauthorized copies of the designated material, (3) inform the person or persons to whom unauthorized disclosures were made of all the terms of this Order, and (4) use reasonable efforts to have such person or persons execute the Agreement to Be Bound (Exhibit A). 8. INADVERTENT PRODUCTION OF PRIVILEGED OR OTHERWISE PROTECTED MATERIAL 14 15 16 OF- z 17 - - When a producing party gives notice that certain inadvertently produced material is subject to a claim of privilege or other protection, the obligations of the receiving parties are those set forth in Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule No. 26(b)(5)(B). This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedures may be established in an 18 e-discovery order that provides for production without prior privilege review 19 0 pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. Rules Nos. 502(d) and (e). 0. 20 9. 21 Without written permission from the designator or a Court order, a party may FILING UNDER SEAL 22 not file in the public record in this action any designated material. A party seeking 23 to file under seal any designated material must comply with Local Rule 79-1. 24 Filings may be made under seal only pursuant to a court order authorizing the 25 sealing of the specific material at issue. The fact that a document has been 26 designated under this Order is insufficient to justify filing under seal. Instead, 271 parties must explain the basis for confidentiality of each document sought to be 28 I filed under seal. Because a party other than the designator will often be seeking to -9- [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER CASE No. 5:13-CV-02349-PSG-(Ex) Case 5: PSG-E Document 29-1 Filed 09/16/14 Page 10 of 11 Page ID #:474 1 file designated material, cooperation between the parties in preparing, and in 2 reducing the number and extent of, requests for under seal filing is essential. If a 3 receiving party’s request to file designated material under seal pursuant to Local 4 Rule 79-5.1 is denied by the Court, then the receiving party may file the material in 5 the public record unless (1) the designator seeks reconsideration within four days of 6 the denial, or (2) as otherwise instructed by the Court. 7 10. 8 Within 60 days after the final disposition of this action, each party shall ’0 9 ’U 10 F- 11 ’0 12 13 14 15 16 C-’’- z 17 FINAL DISPOSITION return all designated material to the designator or destroy such material, including all copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries, and any other format reproducing or capturing any designated material. The receiving party must submit a written certification to the designator by the 60-day deadline that (1) identifies (by category, where appropriate) all the designated material that was returned or destroyed, and (2) affirms that the receiving party has not retained any copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries, or any other format reproducing or capturing any of the designated material. This provision shall not prevent counsel from retaining an archival copy of all pleadings, motion papers, trial, deposition, and hearing transcripts, legal memoranda, correspondence, deposition and trial exhibits, 18 expert reports, attorney work product, and consultant and expert work product, 19 0 even if such materials contain designated material. Any such archival copies 20 remain subject to this Order. 0 21 2211 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 24 Dated: VIA41 Honorable Charles F. Eick United States Magistrate Judge 25 26 27 28 -10- [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER CASE No. 5:13-CV-02349-PSG-(EX) Case 5: PSG.-E Document 29.-1 Filed 09/16/14 Page 11 of 11 Page ID #:475 1 EXHIBIT A 2 AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND 3 4 I, [print or type full name], of_____________________ [print or type full address], declare under penalty of perjury that I 5 6 have read in its entirety and understand the Protective Order that was issued by the 7 United States District Court for the Central District of California on 8 ’0 9 I0 10 I-. 11 0, 12 13 14 15 16 UI- z :< c_I) o 17 [date] in the case of Neptune Trading Inc. et al v. Master Cutlery, Inc. Case No. 5:13-cv-02349-PGS-(Ex). I agree to comply with and to be bound by all the terms of this Protective Order, and I understand and acknowledge that failure to so comply could expose me to sanctions and punishment for contempt. I solemnly promise that I will not disclose in any manner any information or item that is subject to this Protective Order to any person or entity except in strict compliance with this Order. I further agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Central District of California for the purpose of enforcing this Order, even if such enforcement proceedings occur after termination of this action. I hereby appoint 18 [print or type full name] of____ [print or type full address and telephone number] as my 19 California agent for service of process in connection with this action or of any 20 proceedings related to enforcement of this Order. 0. 21 22 Date: 23 City and State where sworn and signed: 24 25 Printed name: [print name] 26 27 Signature: [signature] 28 -11- [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER CASENO. 5:13-CV-02349-PSG-(Ex) I

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?