Alfred Meza v. Sullivan Luxury Cars LLC et al
Filing
14
ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge Virginia A. Phillips Re Stipulation of Dismissal 13 . IT IS SO ORDERED. (ad)
JS-6
1 MICHAEL L. TRACY, ESQ., SBN 237779
2 MTRACY@MICHAELTRACYLAW.COM
LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL TRACY
3 2030 Main Street, Suite 1300
4 Irvine, CA 92614
T: (949) 260-9171
5 F: (866) 365-3051
6
7
Attorneys for Plaintiff Alfred Meza
LAURIE D. RAU (CSBN 183035)
8 ANTHONY G. CHAVOS (CSBN 131937)
CRA VOS & RAU, APLC
9 3 MacArthur Place, Suite 150
1 0 Santa 435-9505 92707
~714) Ana, CA
714) 435-9506 FAX
11 mail: lrau@chavosandrau.com
Email: achavos@chavosandrau.com
12
13 Attorneys for Defendant SULLIVAN LUXURY CARS, LLC
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
EASTERN DIVISION
17
18 ALFRED MEZA, AN INDIVIDUAL;
19
Plaintiff,
20
Case No.: 5:
14-cv-00042-VAP-SPx
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
vs.
21
22 SULLIV AN
DELAWARE
LUXURY CARS, LLC, A
CORPORATION; and
23 DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,
24
Defendants.
Complaint Filed: 1/08/2014
Trial Date: None
25
26 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, pursuant to Federal Rules of
27 Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(1) by and between Plaintiff ALFRED MEZA and all
28 Defendants who have appeared in this action, as follows:
-1-
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
1 1. This action was commenced on January 8, 2014.
2 2. The action is not a class action; a receiver has not been appointed and
3 the action is not governed by any statute ofthe United States that requires an order of
4 the court for dismissaL.
5 3. This action is hereby dismissed, in its entirety, with prejudice.
6
LA W OFFICES OF MICHAEL TRACY
7 DATED: November 13,2014
8
lsi Michael Tracy
By:
9
MICHAEL TRACY, Attorney for Plaintiff
Alfred Meza
10
11
12 Dated: November 13,2014
13
CRA VOS & RAU, APLC
By
lsi Laurie Rau
LAURIE D. RAU
ANTHONY G. CHA VOS
Attorneys for Defendant SULLIVAN
LUXURY CARS, LLC
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED:~
, . ~PL
21
22
UNIT
0 TATES DISTRICT JUDGE
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?