East Valley Water District et al v. San Bernardino International Airport Authority et al
Filing
31
ORDER DISMISSING State Law Claims by Judge Gary A. Feess: Plaintiff concurs that dismissal of the remaining state law claims may be proper, and makes no argument in support of retaining them. Accordingly, each of Plaintiff's remainingclaims are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. See document for details. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (smo)
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No.
ED CV 14-00138 GAF (SPx)
Title
East Valley Water District et al v. San Bernardino International Airport Authority
et al
Present: The Honorable
Date
July 11, 2014
GARY ALLEN FEESS
Stephen Montes Kerr
Deputy Clerk
None
Court Reporter / Recorder
N/A
Tape No.
Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:
Attorneys Present for Defendants:
None
None
Proceedings:
ORDER DISMISSING STATE LAW CLAIMS
On June 20, 2014, the Court determined that it did not have jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s
claims against the United States. (Docket No. 20 [6/20/14 Order].) Because those claims
presented the only federal question, and no diversity jurisdiction exists, Plaintiff was ordered to
show cause why the remaining state law claims should not be dismissed.
Plaintiff—and both Defendants—have now responded. (Docket Nos. 28, 29, 30.)
Defendants agree that the Court cannot exercise supplemental jurisdiction over state law claims
when the underlying federal claims have been dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
See Scott v. Pasadena Unified Sch. Dist., 306 F.3d 646, 664 (9th Cir. 2002) (“if the court
dismisses [all federal claims] for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, it has no discretion and must
dismiss all [remaining state law] claims”) (quoting Herman Family Revocable Trust v. Teddy
Bear, 254 F.3d 802, 806 (9th Cir. 2001)).
Plaintiff concurs that dismissal of the remaining state law claims may be proper, and
makes no argument in support of retaining them. Accordingly, each of Plaintiff’s remaining
claims are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
CV-90 (06/04)
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Page 1 of 1
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
