Morhy v. Long

Filing 24

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY by Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh for Report and Recommendation (issued) 20 . The Court a ccepts the Report and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. Further, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made asubstantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right and therefore, a certificate of appealability is denied. See order for details. (jy)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

AARON M. MORHY,
Petitioner,

11
12
13

v.
DAVID LONG, WARDEN,

14

Respondent.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. ED CV 14-301-BRO (PJW)
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND
ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS,
AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED
STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND
DENYING CERTIFICATE OF
APPEALABILITY

15
16

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the

17

Petition, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the

18

United States Magistrate Judge.

19

de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has

20

objected.

21

conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

22

Further, the Court has engaged in a

The Court accepts the Report and adopts the findings,

Further, for the reasons stated in the Report and

23

Recommendation, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a

24

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right and

25

therefore, a certificate of appealability is denied.

26
27
28

See 28 U.S.C.

1

§ 2253(c)(2); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S.

2

322, 336 (2003).

3
4

DATED:

January 16, 2015.

5
6
7

BEVERLY REID O’CONNELL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

C:\Users\jyerke\AppData\Local\Temp\notesC7A056\Order accep r&r.wpd

2