Jonathan Dumas v. David Long

Filing 28

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Margaret M. Morrow for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 24 . The Court concurs with and accepts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge and overrules the Objections. IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice. (dml)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 JONATHAN DUMAS, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) ) ) DAVID LONG, ) ) ) Respondent. ) ________________________________ Case No. EDCV 14-328 MMM(JC) (PROPOSED) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of 19 Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (the “Petition”) and all of the records 20 herein, including the attached Report and Recommendation of United States 21 Magistrate Judge (“Report and Recommendation”), and petitioner’s objections to 22 the Report and Recommendation (“Objections”). The Court has further made a de 23 novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which 24 objection is made. The Court concurs with and accepts the findings, conclusions, 25 and recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge and overrules the 26 Objections. 27 IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying the Petition and 28 dismissing this action with prejudice. 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order, the 2 Report and Recommendation, and the Judgment herein on petitioner and counsel 3 for respondent. 4 LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. 5 6 DATED: August 6, 2015 7 8 ________________________________________ 9 HONORABLE MARGARET M. MORROW UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?