Joan M Applewhite v. Anaya Law Group

Filing 84

Minutes in Chambers by Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym.Order to Show Cause Why Order for Judgment Debtor Examination of Alana Anaya Should Not Be Vacated. Accordingly, plaintiff is ordered to show cause on or before April 29, 2016 why the order for a judgment debtor examination of Alana Anaya should not be vacated. Absent a satisfactory response by that date, the court will vacate the order (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS). (kca)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No.

ED CV 14-385-JGB (SPx)

Title

JOAN M. APPLEWHITE v. ANAYA LAW GROUP

Present: The Honorable

Date

April 26, 2016

Sheri Pym, United States Magistrate Judge

Kimberly Carter

None

None

Deputy Clerk

Court Reporter / Recorder

Tape No.

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff:

Proceedings:

Attorneys Present for Defendant:

(In Chambers) Order to Show Cause Why Order for Judgment Debtor
Examination of Alana Anaya Should Not Be Vacated

On April 18, 2016, the court granted plaintiff’s application to examine Alana B.
Anaya regarding enforcement of the judgment in this case. That application indicated
Alana Anaya is a judgment debtor in this case. But as defendant pointed out in an
objection filed on April 21, 2016, Alana Anaya is not a judgment debtor. Rather, the
judgment is solely against defendant Anaya Law Group. Docket no. 74.
Accordingly, plaintiff is ordered to show cause on or before April 29, 2016 why
the order for a judgment debtor examination of Alana Anaya should not be vacated.
Absent a satisfactory response by that date, the court will vacate the order.
Plaintiff may also submit an application for an examination of a third person
regarding enforcement of the judgment, but any such application must be supported by
an affidavit as required by California Code of Civil Procedure §§ 491.110 and 708.120.

CV-90 (06/04)

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Page 1 of 1