Karen Bell v. Carolyn W Colvin
Filing
23
ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES by Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney fees under the EAJA in the amount of THREE THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED FIFTY-EIGHT DOLLARS AND FIFTY-TWO CENTS ($3,858.52), and costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920, in the amount of FOUR HUNDRED DOLLARS ($400.00), subject to the terms of the above-referenced Stipulation (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS). (kca)
1
2
3
4
5
Shanny J. Lee, Calif. Bar No. 213599
LAW OFFICES OF HARRY J. BINDER
AND CHARLES E. BINDER, P.C.
60 East 42nd Street Suite 520
New York, NY 10165
Phone (212) 677-6801
Fax (646) 273-2196
Email: fedcourt@binderlawfirm.com
6
7
Attorneys for Plaintiff Karen Bell
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
13
14
15
KAREN BELL,
Plaintiff,
v.
16
17
18
19
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner of Social
Security,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No.: 5:14-cv-00652-SP
ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY
FEES UNDER THE EQUAL
ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT,
PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d),
AND COSTS, PURSUANT TO 28
U.S.C. § 1920
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Based upon the parties’ Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal
Access to Justice Act (EAJA) Fees and Costs, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall
be awarded attorney fees under the EAJA in the amount of THREE THOUSAND
EIGHT HUNDRED FIFTY-EIGHT DOLLARS AND FIFTY-TWO CENTS
($3,858.52), and costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920, in the amount of FOUR
HUNDRED DOLLARS ($400.00), subject to the terms of the above-referenced
Stipulation, to include the United States Department of the Treasury’s Offset
28
1
1
Program pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010). Any payment shall
2
be delivered to Plaintiff’s counsel.
3
4
5
6
Dated: December 4, 2015
Sheri Pym
United States Magistrate Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?