Karen Bell v. Carolyn W Colvin

Filing 23

ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES by Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney fees under the EAJA in the amount of THREE THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED FIFTY-EIGHT DOLLARS AND FIFTY-TWO CENTS ($3,858.52), and costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920, in the amount of FOUR HUNDRED DOLLARS ($400.00), subject to the terms of the above-referenced Stipulation (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS). (kca)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 Shanny J. Lee, Calif. Bar No. 213599 LAW OFFICES OF HARRY J. BINDER AND CHARLES E. BINDER, P.C. 60 East 42nd Street Suite 520 New York, NY 10165 Phone (212) 677-6801 Fax (646) 273-2196 Email: fedcourt@binderlawfirm.com 6 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff Karen Bell 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 14 15 KAREN BELL, Plaintiff, v. 16 17 18 19 CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No.: 5:14-cv-00652-SP ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), AND COSTS, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Based upon the parties’ Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) Fees and Costs, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney fees under the EAJA in the amount of THREE THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED FIFTY-EIGHT DOLLARS AND FIFTY-TWO CENTS ($3,858.52), and costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920, in the amount of FOUR HUNDRED DOLLARS ($400.00), subject to the terms of the above-referenced Stipulation, to include the United States Department of the Treasury’s Offset 28 1 1 Program pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010). Any payment shall 2 be delivered to Plaintiff’s counsel. 3 4 5 6 Dated: December 4, 2015 Sheri Pym United States Magistrate Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?