Dylan Wisehart Randall v. Carolyn W Colvin

Filing 23

JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Victor E Bianchini in favor of Dylan Wisehart Randall against Carolyn W Colvin. For the reasons set forth in the accompany Decision and Order 22 , it is hereby DECREED THAT (1) Plaintiff's request for an order rema nding this case for further proceedings is GRANTED and the Commissioner's decision is REVERSED; (2) the Commissioner's request for an order affirming the Commissioner's final decision and dismissing this action is DENIED; (3) judgment is entered in Plaintiff's favor and this case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the Decision and Order; and (4) this case is CLOSED without prejudice to a timely application for attorneys' fees and costs. ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ). (wr)

Download PDF
JS-6 1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 Case No. EDCV14-00683-VEB 8 DYLAN WISEHART RANDALL, 9 Plaintiff, JUDGMENT 10 vs. 11 12 13 CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. 14 For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Decision and Order, it is hereby 15 DECREED THAT (1) Plaintiff’s request for an order remanding this case for further 16 proceedings is GRANTED and the Commissioner’s decision is REVERSED; (2) the 17 Commissioner’s request for an order affirming the Commissioner’s final decision 18 and dismissing the action is DENIED; (3) judgment is entered in Plaintiff’s favor 19 20 1 JUDGMENT – RANDALL v COLVIN 14-CV-00683-VEB 1 and this case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the Decision and 2 Order; and (4) this case is CLOSED without prejudice to a timely application for 3 attorneys’ fees and costs. 4 5 6 DATED this 8th day of March, 2016, /s/Victor E. Bianchini VICTOR E. BIANCHINI UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 2 JUDGMENT – RANDALL v COLVIN 14-CV-00683-VEB

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?