James Arthur Edwards v. Jeffrey Beard
Filing
59
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Virginia A. Phillips for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 54 , NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss The First Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus as Untimely 39 . the Court accepts the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Motion is GRANTED; (2) the Petition is DENIED; and (3) Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice. (rh)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
JAMES ARTHUR EDWARDS,
)
)
Petitioner,
)
v.
)
)
)
JEFFREY BEARD,
)
Respondent.
)
_________________________________ )
NO. EDCV 14-848-VAP (KS)
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED
STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
17
18
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Petition for
19
Writ of Habeas Corpus (“Petition”), all of the records herein including the Motion to Dismiss
20
(“Motion”) and related briefing, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate
21
Judge (“Report”), and Petitioner’s Objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and
22
Recommendation (“Objections”). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Fed. R. Civ. P.
23
72(b), the Court has conducted a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which
24
objections have been stated.
25
26
Petitioner makes new arguments concerning his entitlement to equitable tolling in his
27
Objections. A district court has discretion, but is not required, to consider evidence or
28
arguments presented for the first time in objections to a report and recommendation. See
1
Brown v. Roe, 279 F.3d 742, 744-45 (9th Cir. 2002); United States v. Howell, 231 F.3d 615,
2
621-22 (9th Cir. 2000). The Court has exercised its discretion to consider Petitioner’s new
3
assertions and evidence but concludes that they do not alter the analysis and conclusions set
4
forth in the Report.
5
6
Having completed its review, the Court accepts the findings and recommendations set
7
forth in the Report. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Motion is GRANTED; (2)
8
the Petition is DENIED; and (3) Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with
9
prejudice.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DATED: March 30, 2017
______________________________________
VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?