Pepper v. City of Riverside et al
Filing
44
JUDGMENT by Judge Jesus G. Bernal related to: Stipulation for Judgment 43 . (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (See document for specifics.) (iva)
1
2
JS-6
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
LETITIA E. PEPPER,
12
Case No.: EDCV 14-00916 JGB (SPx)
Plaintiff,
Assigned to the Hon. Jesus G. Bernal
13
JUDGMENT DISMISSING ACTION
WITH PREJUDICE
14
v.
15
CITY OF RIVERSIDE, a California
municipal corporation; WILLIAM R.
BAILEY, individually and in his
official capacity as Mayor; GREGORY
P. PRIAMOS, individually and in his
official capacity as City Attorney;
SERGIO DIAZ, individually and in his
capacity as Chief of Police,
16
17
18
19
Defendants.
20
21
Plaintiff Letitia E. Pepper (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants City of Riverside,
22
William R. Bailey, Gregory P. Priamos and Sergio Diaz (“Defendants”), have
23
stipulated to rendition and entry of judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
24
Procedure 41 (a) (2).
25
IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED AND DECREED as follows:
26
1.
Judgment shall be entered forthwith in this matter dismissing
27
Plaintiff’s complaint against each defendant herein, with prejudice. Such dismissal
28
with prejudice shall constitute a merger of all Plaintiff’s stated claims and any
B URKE , W ILLIAMS &
S ORENS EN , LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
OAKLA ND
RIV #4838-7751-9396 v1
-1-
JUDGMENT DISMISSING ACTION
WITH PREJUDICE
1
unstated claims which Plaintiff may have asserted in this action and a bar, without
2
any limitation, to the reassertion of any stated or merged claim.
2.
3
Upon notification to Defendants’ counsel of entry of judgment,
4
Defendant City of Riverside (“City”) shall pay the sum of fifty thousand dollars
5
($50,000.00) to Plaintiff, hereafter “Settlement Amount,” solely for the purpose of
6
compromising, settling, and fully satisfying any claim for damages, attorney fees
7
costs or other monetary claim that Plaintiff could have asserted or did assert in this
8
action. Defendant City will cause the Settlement Amount to be wire transferred to
9
Thompson Advocacy Attorney-Client Trust Account, within five business days of
10
either notification of Defendants counsel by the Court of the Court’s entry of
11
Judgment Dismissing Action with Prejudice or written transmission by Plaintiff’s
12
counsel to Defendants’ counsel of the details of such trust account, whichever is
13
later.
14
15
16
3.
Such payment by City is not an implied or express admission of
liability on the part of Defendants or any of them.
4.
Plaintiff and her counsel have reviewed and approved the proposed
17
judgment as to substance and form.
18
IT IS SO ORDERED.
19
DATED:
May 18,2015
20
___________________________________
Jesus G. Bernal, United States District Judge
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
B URKE , W ILLIAMS &
S ORENS EN , LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
OAKLA ND
RIV #4838-7751-9396 v1
-2-
JUDGMENT DISMISSING ACTION
WITH PREJUDICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?