Pepper v. City of Riverside et al

Filing 44

JUDGMENT by Judge Jesus G. Bernal related to: Stipulation for Judgment 43 . (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (See document for specifics.) (iva)

Download PDF
1 2 JS-6 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LETITIA E. PEPPER, 12 Case No.: EDCV 14-00916 JGB (SPx) Plaintiff, Assigned to the Hon. Jesus G. Bernal 13 JUDGMENT DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 14 v. 15 CITY OF RIVERSIDE, a California municipal corporation; WILLIAM R. BAILEY, individually and in his official capacity as Mayor; GREGORY P. PRIAMOS, individually and in his official capacity as City Attorney; SERGIO DIAZ, individually and in his capacity as Chief of Police, 16 17 18 19 Defendants. 20 21 Plaintiff Letitia E. Pepper (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants City of Riverside, 22 William R. Bailey, Gregory P. Priamos and Sergio Diaz (“Defendants”), have 23 stipulated to rendition and entry of judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 24 Procedure 41 (a) (2). 25 IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED AND DECREED as follows: 26 1. Judgment shall be entered forthwith in this matter dismissing 27 Plaintiff’s complaint against each defendant herein, with prejudice. Such dismissal 28 with prejudice shall constitute a merger of all Plaintiff’s stated claims and any B URKE , W ILLIAMS & S ORENS EN , LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW OAKLA ND RIV #4838-7751-9396 v1 -1- JUDGMENT DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 1 unstated claims which Plaintiff may have asserted in this action and a bar, without 2 any limitation, to the reassertion of any stated or merged claim. 2. 3 Upon notification to Defendants’ counsel of entry of judgment, 4 Defendant City of Riverside (“City”) shall pay the sum of fifty thousand dollars 5 ($50,000.00) to Plaintiff, hereafter “Settlement Amount,” solely for the purpose of 6 compromising, settling, and fully satisfying any claim for damages, attorney fees 7 costs or other monetary claim that Plaintiff could have asserted or did assert in this 8 action. Defendant City will cause the Settlement Amount to be wire transferred to 9 Thompson Advocacy Attorney-Client Trust Account, within five business days of 10 either notification of Defendants counsel by the Court of the Court’s entry of 11 Judgment Dismissing Action with Prejudice or written transmission by Plaintiff’s 12 counsel to Defendants’ counsel of the details of such trust account, whichever is 13 later. 14 15 16 3. Such payment by City is not an implied or express admission of liability on the part of Defendants or any of them. 4. Plaintiff and her counsel have reviewed and approved the proposed 17 judgment as to substance and form. 18 IT IS SO ORDERED. 19 DATED: May 18,2015 20 ___________________________________ Jesus G. Bernal, United States District Judge 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 B URKE , W ILLIAMS & S ORENS EN , LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW OAKLA ND RIV #4838-7751-9396 v1 -2- JUDGMENT DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?