Desmond Jones v. Prueite et al
Filing
38
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams: Currently pending with the Court is the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Third Amended Complaint filed by defendants Pruette, Akhigbe, Leibert and Ponder on January 13, 2015. On January 16, 2015, plaintiff filed his Notice of Further Retaliation by Defendant, in which he raises serious allegations of misconduct by at least one defendant in this action. No later than February 6, 2015, defendants shall file a response to the Notice, which shall include declarations as necessary to rebut plaintiffs allegations, if defendants intend to do so. The Court will then determine what, if any, action will be taken. (es)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES-GENERAL
Case No. ED CV 14-00936-JLS (PLA)
Date January 23, 2015
Title: Desmond Jones v. Pruette, et al.
G U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
PRESENT: THE HONORABLE
PAUL L. ABRAMS
Christianna Howard
Deputy Clerk
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFFS:
: MAGISTRATE JUDGE
N/A
Court Reporter / Recorder
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANTS:
NONE
PROCEEDINGS:
N/A
Tape No.
NONE
(IN CHAMBERS)
Currently pending with the Court is the “Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint” filed by
defendants Pruette, Akhigbe, Leibert and Ponder on January 13, 2015.
On January 16, 2015, plaintiff filed his “Notice of Further Retaliation by Defendant,” in which he raises serious
allegations of misconduct by at least one defendant in this action. No later than February 6, 2015, defendants
shall file a response to the Notice, which shall include declarations as necessary to rebut plaintiff’s allegations,
if defendants intend to do so. The Court will then determine what, if any, action will be taken.
cc:
Desmond Jones, pro se
Cassandra Jean Shryock, CAAG
Initials of Deputy Clerk
CV-90 (10/98)
CIVIL MINUTES -
GENERAL
ch
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?