Desmond Jones v. Prueite et al

Filing 38

(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams: Currently pending with the Court is the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Third Amended Complaint filed by defendants Pruette, Akhigbe, Leibert and Ponder on January 13, 2015. On January 16, 2015, plaintiff filed his Notice of Further Retaliation by Defendant, in which he raises serious allegations of misconduct by at least one defendant in this action. No later than February 6, 2015, defendants shall file a response to the Notice, which shall include declarations as necessary to rebut plaintiffs allegations, if defendants intend to do so. The Court will then determine what, if any, action will be taken. (es)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES-GENERAL Case No. ED CV 14-00936-JLS (PLA) Date January 23, 2015 Title: Desmond Jones v. Pruette, et al. G U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE PRESENT: THE HONORABLE PAUL L. ABRAMS Christianna Howard Deputy Clerk ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFFS: : MAGISTRATE JUDGE N/A Court Reporter / Recorder ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANTS: NONE PROCEEDINGS: N/A Tape No. NONE (IN CHAMBERS) Currently pending with the Court is the “Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint” filed by defendants Pruette, Akhigbe, Leibert and Ponder on January 13, 2015. On January 16, 2015, plaintiff filed his “Notice of Further Retaliation by Defendant,” in which he raises serious allegations of misconduct by at least one defendant in this action. No later than February 6, 2015, defendants shall file a response to the Notice, which shall include declarations as necessary to rebut plaintiff’s allegations, if defendants intend to do so. The Court will then determine what, if any, action will be taken. cc: Desmond Jones, pro se Cassandra Jean Shryock, CAAG Initials of Deputy Clerk CV-90 (10/98) CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL ch

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?