St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company et al v. Centex Homes et al

Filing 77

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Upon Stipulation 76 , pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(1)(B), and the settlement agreement of the parties, Travelers and Centex hereby dismiss the above-entitled action with prejudice. Further, the Court HEREBY ORDERS that each party to bear its own costs related to this action. (gk)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – EASTERN DIVISION

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
CENTEX HOMES, a Nevada general
)
partnership, CENTEX REAL ESTATE )
CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation; )
and DOES 1 through 10 inclusive,
)
)
)
Defendants.
ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE
INSURANCE COMPANY, a
Connecticut corporation; ST. PAUL
MERCURY INSURANCE COMPANY,
a Connecticut corporation; and
TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY
COMPANY OF AMERICA, a
Connecticut corporation,

Case No.: 5:14-cv-01216-AB-JC
[PROPOSED] ORDER
DISMISSING ACTION WITH
PREJUDICE

28

1
Case No.: 5:14-cv-01216-AB-JC
[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

1

GOOD CAUSE BEING SHOWN, whereas Plaintiffs St. Paul Fire and Marine

2

Insurance Company, St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company, and Travelers Property

3

Casualty Company of America (collectively, “Travelers”), and Defendants Centex

4

Homes and Centex Real Estate Corporation (collectively, “Centex”), have agreed to

5

resolve this matter and have executed a Settlement and Release Agreement.

6
7

NOW THEREFORE pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41 (a)

8

(1) (B), and the settlement agreement of the parties, Travelers and Centex hereby

9

dismiss the above-entitled action with prejudice.

10
11
12

Further, the Court HEREBY ORDERS that each party to bear its own costs
related to this action.

13
14
15
16
17

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December ___, 2015

________________________
Hon. André Birotte
United States District Judge

January 5, 2016

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2
Case No.: 5:14-cv-01216-AB-JC
[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE