Corey David Santifer v. Tim Virga

Filing 22

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge 20 . No Objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed within the time allowed for Objections. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied, and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing the action with prejudice. (kl)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 COREY DAVID SANTIFER, 13 14 15 Petitioner, v. TIM VIRGA, Warden, 16 Respondent. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. EDCV 14-1252-MWF (JEM) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No Objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed within the time allowed for Objections. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied, and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing the action with prejudice. 25 26 27 28 DATED: September 20, 2016 MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?