Paul Hupp et al v. City of Beaumont et al

Filing 144

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 130 by Judge Virginia A. Phillips: Plaintiff has not filed any written Objections to the Report within the time permitted. The Court accepts the findings and r ecommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant Jack Huntsmans unopposed Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 110 is granted as to plaintiff Aristea Hupp, and plaintiff Aristea Hupps claim against defendant Huntsman in Count 3 of the Second Amended Complaint is dismissed with prejudice. (ad)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

PAUL HUPP, et al.,

12

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

CITY OF BEAUMONT, et al.,

15
16

Defendants.
___________________________

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. ED CV 14-1303-VAP (SP)
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED
STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

17
18

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Second Amended

19 Complaint, records on file, and the June 9, 2017 Report and Recommendation of the
20 United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff has not filed any written Objections to the
21 Report within the time permitted. The Court accepts the findings and
22 recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.
23 //
24 //
25
26
27
28

1

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant Jack Huntsman’s unopposed

2 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (docket no. 110) is granted as to plaintiff
3 Aristea Hupp, and plaintiff Aristea Hupp’s claim against defendant Huntsman in
4 Count 3 of the Second Amended Complaint is dismissed with prejudice.
5
6
7 DATED: July 11, 2017
8

____________________________________
HONORABLE VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2